PMFLX vs. DFCMX
PMFLX (PIMCO Flexible Municipal Income Fund) and DFCMX (DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. PMFLX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DFCMX.
Performance
PMFLX vs. DFCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PMFLX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFCMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 2.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.60%
- 10Y*
- 1.17%
PMFLX vs. DFCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PMFLX PIMCO Flexible Municipal Income Fund | 0.66% |
DFCMX DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMFLX and DFCMX is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMFLX vs. DFCMX — Risk / Return Rank
PMFLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFCMX
PMFLX vs. DFCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Flexible Municipal Income Fund (PMFLX) and DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMFLX | DFCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 4.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 12.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 43.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMFLX vs. DFCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMFLX drawdown since its inception was -0.30%, smaller than the maximum DFCMX drawdown of -2.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMFLX and DFCMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMFLX | DFCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.30% | -2.20% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | 0.00% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -0.25% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility
PMFLX vs. DFCMX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMFLX | DFCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.09% | 0.59% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.09% | 0.89% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.09% | 0.88% | +2.21% |
PMFLX vs. DFCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMFLX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DFCMX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMFLX vs. DFCMX - Dividend Comparison
PMFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than DFCMX's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFCMX DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.47% | 2.23% | 2.61% | 1.70% | 0.71% | 0.36% | 0.87% | 1.43% | 1.04% | 0.87% | 0.86% | 0.82% |
PMFLX PIMCO Flexible Municipal Income Fund | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMFLX and DFCMX have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PMFLX and DFCMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer