PMAP vs. BFJL
PMAP (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April) and BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Over the past year, PMAP returned 6.67% vs -15.77% for BFJL. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMAP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFJL.
Performance
PMAP vs. BFJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAP achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly higher than BFJL's -4.47% return.
PMAP
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- 6.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFJL
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- 6M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- -4.47%
- 1Y
- -15.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMAP vs. BFJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April | 3.71% | 3.02% |
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | -4.47% | -7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAP and BFJL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAP vs. BFJL — Risk / Return Rank
PMAP
BFJL
PMAP vs. BFJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMAP | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +13.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.66 | 0.80 | +1.86 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.21 | -0.74 | +19.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 94.83 | -1.03 | +95.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMAP vs. BFJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAP drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum BFJL drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAP and BFJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAP | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -21.27% | +19.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.35% | -21.27% | +20.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -18.46% | +18.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -12.67% | +12.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 15.27% | -15.20% |
Volatility
PMAP vs. BFJL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP) is 0.27%, while FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that PMAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAP | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.27% | 2.86% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.91% | 6.80% | -5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15% | 13.16% | -12.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.26% | 13.27% | -11.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.26% | 13.27% | -11.01% |
PMAP vs. BFJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BFJL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAP vs. BFJL - Dividend Comparison
PMAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | 1.41% | 1.35% |
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAP and BFJL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BFJL has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to PMAP (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAP dropped -1.75% vs BFJL's -21.27%.
On 1-year performance, PMAP leads with 6.67% vs -15.77% for BFJL. On fees, PMAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PMAP has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PMAP has performed better with a 6.67% return vs -15.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PMAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.
BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.00% for PMAP.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMAP and 0.90% for BFJL.
PMAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMAP and BFJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer