PLVIX vs. CMNWX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLVIX (Principal LargeCap Value Fund III) and CMNWX (Principal Capital Appreciation Fund) are both mutual funds - PLVIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Principal, while CMNWX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, PLVIX returned 11.79%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for CMNWX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PLVIX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for CMNWX.

Performance

PLVIX vs. CMNWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LargeCap Value Fund III (PLVIX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLVIX achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly lower than CMNWX's 10.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PLVIX has underperformed CMNWX with an annualized return of 11.79%, while CMNWX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.

PLVIX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 3.81%
• YTD: 9.86%
• 6M: 10.17%
• 1Y: 21.57%
• 3Y*: 18.31%
• 5Y*: 10.58%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

CMNWX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 5.05%
• YTD: 10.80%
• 6M: 10.19%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 23.41%
• 5Y*: 14.89%
• 10Y*: 15.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLVIX vs. CMNWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLVIX Principal LargeCap Value Fund III	9.86%	10.94%	23.06%	9.96%	-4.98%	24.24%	3.19%	26.49%	-6.01%	16.87%
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	10.80%	13.27%	32.14%	25.01%	-16.37%	27.45%	18.36%	32.21%	-4.12%	20.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PLVIX and CMNWX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2000	0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between PLVIX and CMNWX has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PLVIX vs. CMNWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLVIX

PLVIX Risk / Return Rank: 48
PLVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PLVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PLVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PLVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
PLVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

CMNWX

CMNWX Risk / Return Rank: 55
CMNWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CMNWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CMNWX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CMNWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CMNWX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLVIX vs. CMNWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap Value Fund III (PLVIX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLVIX	CMNWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.11	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	2.90	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.37	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	2.93	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.27	13.71	-3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLVIX vs. CMNWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the CMNWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLVIX and CMNWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLVIX	CMNWX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	2.11	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.89	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.91	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.72	-0.30

Drawdowns

PLVIX vs. CMNWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLVIX drawdown since its inception was -62.55%, which is greater than CMNWX's maximum drawdown of -50.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLVIX and CMNWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLVIX	CMNWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.55%	-50.43%	-12.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.94%	-8.91%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.03%	-19.54%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.32%	-23.35%	+6.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.51%	-33.26%	-5.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.10%	-6.95%	-3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	1.90%	+0.29%

Volatility

PLVIX vs. CMNWX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LargeCap Value Fund III (PLVIX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) have volatilities of 2.78% and 2.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLVIX	CMNWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	2.85%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.50%	9.42%	-0.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	12.37%	-1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.23%	16.80%	-1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.92%	17.19%	-0.27%

PLVIX vs. CMNWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLVIX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CMNWX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLVIX vs. CMNWX - Dividend Comparison

PLVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.46%, more than CMNWX's 7.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	7.90%	8.75%	10.03%	0.71%	0.69%	9.52%	5.33%	8.37%	46.60%	7.72%	10.32%	5.42%
PLVIX Principal LargeCap Value Fund III	19.46%	21.38%	15.41%	3.27%	10.14%	9.13%	1.56%	6.52%	11.10%	6.84%	4.52%	8.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLVIX and CMNWX in my portfolio?

PLVIX and CMNWX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLVIX or CMNWX?

CMNWX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to PLVIX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLVIX dropped -62.55% vs CMNWX's -50.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMNWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.