PLTY vs. ARMW
PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
PLTY vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTY achieves a -23.00% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 134.95% return.
PLTY
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- 6M
- -8.14%
- YTD
- -23.00%
- 1Y
- -16.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 50.31%
ARMW
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -28.55%
- 6M
- 146.99%
- YTD
- 134.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.87M | $4.86M | $4.12M | |
| $4.74M | $3.96M | $6.06M |
PLTY vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -23.00% | -0.44% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 134.95% | -41.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTY and ARMW is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTY vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
PLTY
ARMW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTY vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTY vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTY drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTY and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.36% | -56.50% | +15.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.22% | -52.71% | +19.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -27.18% | +12.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.78% | — | — |
Volatility
PLTY vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.02% | 96.03% | -52.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.23% | 96.03% | -43.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.23% | 96.03% | -43.80% |
PLTY vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PLTY and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
PLTY vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
PLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 123.19%, more than ARMW's 62.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 62.70% | 16.38% | 0.00% |
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 123.19% | 112.44% | 7.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTY and ARMW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTY and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 123.19%, compared with 62.70% for ARMW.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.
Find the right allocation for PLTY and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer