PLTW vs. QYLE
Compare and contrast key facts about PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE).
PLTW and QYLE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLTW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025. QYLE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 ESG BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 21, 2023.
Performance
PLTW vs. QYLE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLTW vs. QYLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 8.01% |
QYLE Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
PLTW
- 1D
- 7.69%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- -22.36%
- 6M
- -26.84%
- 1Y
- 75.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLTW vs. QYLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLE's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLTW vs. QYLE — Risk / Return Rank
PLTW
QYLE
PLTW vs. QYLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTW | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTW | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | — | — |
Dividends
PLTW vs. QYLE - Dividend Comparison
PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 114.73%, while QYLE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 114.73% | 72.40% |
QYLE Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PLTW vs. QYLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -45.33%, which is greater than QYLE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and QYLE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTW | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.33% | 0.00% | -45.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.49% | 0.00% | -36.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.36% | 0.00% | -16.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.06% | — | — |
Volatility
PLTW vs. QYLE - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLTW | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.45% | 0.00% | +69.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.38% | 0.00% | +73.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.38% | 0.00% | +73.38% |