PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTU vs. MVLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTU vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTU achieves a -46.71% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.


PLTU

1D
-13.03%
1M
-9.11%
YTD
-46.71%
6M
-46.12%
1Y
-21.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MVLL

1D
7.14%
1M
201.84%
YTD
842.68%
6M
558.01%
1Y
1,215.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTU vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PLTU
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares
-46.71%201.72%
MVLL
GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF
842.68%-10.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTU and MVLL is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025

0.32

PLTU vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PLTU
MVLL

Technology

100.0%
66.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PLTU
100.0%
MVLL
66.6%

Basic Materials

PLTU

-

MVLL

-

Communication Services

PLTU

-

MVLL

-

Consumer Cyclical

PLTU

-

MVLL

-

Consumer Defensive

PLTU

-

MVLL

-

Energy

PLTU

-

MVLL

-

Financial Services

PLTU

-

MVLL

-

Healthcare

PLTU

-

MVLL

-

Industrials

PLTU

-

MVLL

-

Real Estate

PLTU

-

MVLL

-

Utilities

PLTU

-

MVLL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTU vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTU
PLTU Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PLTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTU Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTU Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MVLL
MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTU vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTUMVLLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.21

9.23

-9.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.40

4.79

-4.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.63

-0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

25.11

-25.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.54

52.27

-52.81

PLTU vs. MVLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the MVLL Sharpe Ratio of 9.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTU and MVLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTUMVLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

9.23

-9.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

3.33

-2.93

Drawdowns

PLTU vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTU drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTU and MVLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTUMVLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.14%

-59.02%

-10.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.10%

-48.93%

-19.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.95%

0.00%

-62.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.90%

-22.42%

-9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.45%

23.46%

+15.99%

Volatility

PLTU vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) is 36.67%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.78%. This indicates that PLTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTUMVLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.67%

60.78%

-24.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.36%

96.08%

-18.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

103.08%

133.11%

-30.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

127.24%

139.63%

-12.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

127.24%

139.63%

-12.39%

PLTU vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTU vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.62%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
MVLL
GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLTU
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares
44.62%23.29%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTU and MVLL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVLL has higher volatility (60.78%) compared to PLTU (36.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTU dropped -69.14% vs MVLL's -59.02%.

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1215.17% vs -21.46% for PLTU. On fees, PLTU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, PLTU has been the lower-risk option at 36.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1215.17% return vs -21.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

PLTU has the higher dividend yield at 44.62%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for PLTU and 1.50% for MVLL.

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.23 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTU and MVLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer