PLTU vs. GGLS
PLTU (Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF) and GGLS (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while GGLS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Alphabet Inc. Class A (--100%). PLTU is actively managed, while GGLS is passively managed. Over the past year, PLTU returned -44.11% vs -52.97% for GGLS. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. PLTU charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for GGLS.
Performance
PLTU vs. GGLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTU achieves a -54.93% return, which is significantly lower than GGLS's -17.60% return.
PLTU
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- 6M
- -54.76%
- YTD
- -54.93%
- 1Y
- -44.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGLS
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- 6M
- -11.60%
- YTD
- -17.60%
- 1Y
- -52.97%
- 3Y*
- -32.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTU vs. GGLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF | -54.93% | 223.17% | 14.77% |
GGLS Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares | -17.60% | -42.64% | -2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTU and GGLS is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024 | -0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTU vs. GGLS — Risk / Return Rank
PLTU
GGLS
PLTU vs. GGLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTU | GGLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.66 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | -0.95 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | -1.33 | +0.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTU vs. GGLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTU drawdown since its inception was -79.43%, roughly equal to the maximum GGLS drawdown of -81.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTU and GGLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTU | GGLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.43% | -81.24% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.43% | -56.13% | -23.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -72.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.66% | -79.76% | +11.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.56% | -47.75% | +13.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.89% | 40.13% | +5.76% |
Volatility
PLTU vs. GGLS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU) has a higher volatility of 32.99% compared to Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) at 10.15%. This indicates that PLTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTU | GGLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.99% | 10.15% | +22.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.69% | 22.93% | +56.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.59% | 30.08% | +72.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 125.74% | 31.30% | +94.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 125.74% | 31.30% | +94.44% |
PLTU vs. GGLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTU has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than GGLS's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTU vs. GGLS - Dividend Comparison
PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.89%, more than GGLS's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGLS Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares | 3.10% | 4.87% | 4.31% | 5.80% | 0.20% |
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF | 52.89% | 23.29% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTU and GGLS have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTU has higher volatility (32.99%) compared to GGLS (10.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTU dropped -79.43% vs GGLS's -81.24%.
On 1-year performance, PLTU leads with -44.11% vs -52.97% for GGLS. On fees, PLTU is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, GGLS has been the lower-risk option at 10.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PLTU has performed better with a -44.11% return vs -52.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLTU is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for GGLS.
PLTU has the higher dividend yield at 52.89%, compared with 3.10% for GGLS.
PLTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GGLS is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for PLTU and 1.09% for GGLS.
PLTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTU and GGLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer