PLTU vs. CMGG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG).

PLTU and CMGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLTU is an actively managed fund by Direxion. It was launched on Dec 10, 2024. CMGG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Nov 17, 2025.

Performance

PLTU vs. CMGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PLTU vs. CMGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares	-39.02%	5.41%
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	-27.16%	43.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTU achieves a -39.02% return, which is significantly lower than CMGG's -27.16% return.

PLTU

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: -39.02%
• 6M: -48.12%
• 1Y: 94.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMGG

• 1D: 3.93%
• 1M: -22.70%
• YTD: -27.16%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTU vs. CMGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CMGG's 0.75% expense ratio.

PLTU

Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares

CMGG

Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF

Return for Risk

PLTU vs. CMGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTU

PLTU Risk / Return Rank: 51
PLTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PLTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
PLTU Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PLTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PLTU Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTU vs. CMGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTU	CMGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTU	CMGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.20	+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between PLTU and CMGG is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PLTU vs. CMGG - Dividend Comparison

PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.99%, while CMGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares	38.99%	23.29%	0.12%
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PLTU vs. CMGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTU drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than CMGG's maximum drawdown of -45.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTU and CMGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTU	CMGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.14%	-45.77%	-23.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.60%	-39.60%	-18.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.88%	-13.00%	-14.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.24%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PLTU	CMGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.25%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	114.97%	68.82%	+46.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	128.73%	68.82%	+59.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	128.73%	68.82%	+59.91%