PLTU vs. CMGG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLTU (Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares) and CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CMGG.

Performance

PLTU vs. CMGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PLTU having a -46.71% return and CMGG slightly higher at -45.23%.

PLTU

• 1D: -13.03%
• 1M: -9.11%
• YTD: -46.71%
• 6M: -46.12%
• 1Y: -21.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMGG

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: -20.45%
• YTD: -45.23%
• 6M: -35.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTU vs. CMGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares	-46.71%	5.41%
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	-45.23%	43.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTU and CMGG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.19

Return for Risk

PLTU vs. CMGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTU

PLTU Risk / Return Rank: 8
PLTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PLTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PLTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
PLTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PLTU Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTU vs. CMGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTU	CMGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.54	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTU	CMGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	-0.54	+0.94

Drawdowns

PLTU vs. CMGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTU drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than CMGG's maximum drawdown of -54.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTU and CMGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTU	CMGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.14%	-54.58%	-14.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.95%	-54.58%	-8.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.90%	-21.08%	-10.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PLTU	CMGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	36.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	77.36%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.08%	66.76%	+36.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	127.24%	66.76%	+60.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.24%	66.76%	+60.48%

PLTU vs. CMGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CMGG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTU vs. CMGG - Dividend Comparison

PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.62%, while CMGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares	44.62%	23.29%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTU and CMGG in my portfolio?

PLTU and CMGG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PLTU or CMGG?

On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTU or CMGG?

CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for PLTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTU or CMGG?

PLTU has the higher dividend yield at 44.62%, compared with 0.00% for CMGG.

What is the main difference between PLTU and CMGG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for PLTU and 0.75% for CMGG.