PLTI.L vs. FEPG.L
PLTI.L (IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP) and FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PLTI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPG.L.
Performance
PLTI.L vs. FEPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTI.L achieves a -33.06% return, which is significantly lower than FEPG.L's -3.44% return.
PLTI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- 6M
- -32.21%
- YTD
- -33.06%
- 1Y
- -35.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6,217.92%
FEPG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -3.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PLTI.L vs. FEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTI.L IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP | -33.06% | -7.52% |
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | -3.44% | 8.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTI.L and FEPG.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTI.L vs. FEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
PLTI.L
FEPG.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTI.L vs. FEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP (PLTI.L) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTI.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTI.L vs. FEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTI.L drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, which is greater than FEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTI.L and FEPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTI.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.14% | -35.75% | -23.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.25% | -28.16% | -27.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.04% | -20.83% | -12.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.56% | — | — |
Volatility
PLTI.L vs. FEPG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTI.L | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.73% | 45.69% | +17.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9,849.70% | 45.69% | +9,804.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9,849.70% | 45.69% | +9,804.01% |
PLTI.L vs. FEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FEPG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTI.L vs. FEPG.L - Dividend Comparison
PLTI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.06%, more than FEPG.L's 27.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | 27.80% | 11.50% |
PLTI.L IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP | 58.06% | 11.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTI.L and FEPG.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FEPG.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PLTI.L and 0.65% for FEPG.L.
Find the right allocation for PLTI.L and FEPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer