PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTD vs. GLBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTD vs. GLBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) and Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTD achieves a 26.78% return, which is significantly higher than GLBL's 10.24% return.


PLTD

1D
-0.72%
1M
3.64%
6M
5.36%
YTD
26.78%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-46.97%

GLBL

1D
1.17%
1M
0.42%
6M
9.42%
YTD
10.24%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.43K$927.62$2.16K
$308.34M$340.03M$346.45M

PLTD vs. GLBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PLTD
Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares
26.78%-70.53%-5.12%
GLBL
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF
10.24%20.14%-2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTD and GLBL is -0.47, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024

-0.51

The correlation between PLTD and GLBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.47 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTD vs. GLBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLTD
PLTD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

GLBL
GLBL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GLBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLBL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GLBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLBL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLTD vs. GLBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) and Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTDGLBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.25

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

1.90

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.42

6.89

-6.47

PLTD vs. GLBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTD Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the GLBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTD and GLBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTD vs. GLBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTD drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, which is greater than GLBL's maximum drawdown of -19.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTD and GLBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTDGLBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.34%

-19.75%

-57.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.95%

-10.97%

-16.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.53%

-3.15%

-64.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.13%

-2.64%

-57.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.70%

3.02%

+11.68%

Volatility

PLTD vs. GLBL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) has a higher volatility of 13.69% compared to Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) at 3.49%. This indicates that PLTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTDGLBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.69%

3.49%

+10.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.22%

11.70%

+28.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.47%

14.67%

+37.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.67%

16.53%

+46.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.67%

16.53%

+46.14%

PLTD vs. GLBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTD has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GLBL's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTD vs. GLBL - Dividend Comparison

PLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than GLBL's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GLBL
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF
0.78%0.86%0.15%
PLTD
Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares
2.76%5.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTD and GLBL have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTD has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to GLBL (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTD dropped -77.34% vs GLBL's -19.75%.

On 1-year performance, GLBL leads with 22.93% vs 3.22% for PLTD. On fees, GLBL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GLBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GLBL has performed better with a 22.93% return vs 3.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLBL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for PLTD.

PLTD has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.78% for GLBL.

PLTD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while GLBL is Global Equities. PLTD tracks Palantir Technologies Inc. (-100%), while GLBL tracks MSCI World Ricardo Comparative Advantage Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for PLTD and 0.65% for GLBL.

GLBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTD and GLBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer