PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTA vs. NIOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTA vs. NIOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra PLTR (PLTA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTA achieves a -55.02% return, which is significantly lower than NIOG's -29.05% return.


PLTA

1D
3.85%
1M
6.06%
6M
-50.59%
YTD
-55.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

NIOG

1D
-2.53%
1M
-10.00%
6M
-15.68%
YTD
-29.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTA vs. NIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PLTA
ProShares Ultra PLTR
-55.02%-0.38%
NIOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF
-29.05%3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTA and NIOG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTA vs. NIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra PLTR (PLTA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLTA vs. NIOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTA vs. NIOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTA drawdown since its inception was -80.03%, which is greater than NIOG's maximum drawdown of -56.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTA and NIOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTANIOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.03%

-56.27%

-23.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.15%

-55.54%

-13.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.95%

-26.13%

-17.82%

Volatility

PLTA vs. NIOG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTANIOGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.76%

111.68%

-6.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.76%

111.68%

-6.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.76%

111.68%

-6.92%

Dividends

PLTA vs. NIOG - Dividend Comparison

PLTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while NIOG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
NIOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%
PLTA
ProShares Ultra PLTR
3.26%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTA and NIOG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTA has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.00% for NIOG.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTA and NIOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer