PLSRX vs. BWG
PLSRX (Pacific Funds Strategic Income) and BWG (BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PLSRX returned 4.98%/yr vs 4.92%/yr for BWG. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLSRX charges 0.64%/yr vs 2.66%/yr for BWG.
Performance
PLSRX vs. BWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLSRX achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly higher than BWG's 0.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PLSRX having a 4.98% annualized return and BWG not far behind at 4.92%.
PLSRX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 5.72%
- 3Y*
- 7.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.98%
BWG
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.92%
PLSRX vs. BWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLSRX Pacific Funds Strategic Income | 1.28% | 7.40% | 6.04% | 11.24% | -9.67% | 3.61% | 9.82% | 13.65% | -2.64% | 6.85% |
BWG BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund | 0.15% | 17.38% | 7.31% | 15.94% | -21.53% | 1.34% | 6.30% | 30.59% | -12.14% | 17.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLSRX and BWG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2012 | 0.41 |
The correlation between PLSRX and BWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLSRX vs. BWG — Risk / Return Rank
PLSRX
BWG
PLSRX vs. BWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Strategic Income (PLSRX) and BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLSRX | BWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.18 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 0.86 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | 2.66 | +9.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLSRX vs. BWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLSRX drawdown since its inception was -19.88%, smaller than the maximum BWG drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLSRX and BWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLSRX | BWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -35.39% | +15.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.14% | -12.03% | +9.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.29% | -14.00% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.71% | -34.10% | +20.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.88% | -34.27% | +14.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -4.00% | +3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -10.83% | +9.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | 3.88% | -3.40% |
Volatility
PLSRX vs. BWG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacific Funds Strategic Income (PLSRX) is 0.91%, while BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that PLSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLSRX | BWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | 2.99% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.17% | 8.58% | -6.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68% | 10.57% | -7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 14.07% | -10.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.46% | 15.01% | -10.55% |
PLSRX vs. BWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLSRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BWG's 2.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLSRX vs. BWG - Dividend Comparison
PLSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than BWG's 12.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWG BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund | 12.03% | 11.47% | 12.00% | 11.73% | 13.25% | 8.20% | 6.81% | 6.55% | 8.70% | 8.35% | 10.31% | 16.41% |
PLSRX Pacific Funds Strategic Income | 5.61% | 5.67% | 5.97% | 5.17% | 4.73% | 4.10% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.74% | 3.87% | 4.14% | 4.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLSRX and BWG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWG has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to PLSRX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLSRX dropped -19.88% vs BWG's -35.39%.
PLSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLSRX and BWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer