PLOO vs. KMAR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PLOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF) and KMAR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds. PLOO is actively managed, while KMAR is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLOO charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KMAR.

Performance

PLOO vs. KMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF (PLOO) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLOO achieves a -17.21% return, which is significantly lower than KMAR's 11.95% return.

PLOO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: -17.31%
• YTD: -17.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KMAR

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 1.04%
• 6M: 8.88%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 1Y: 21.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLOO vs. KMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF	-17.21%	1.60%
KMAR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March	11.95%	7.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PLOO and KMAR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

PLOO vs. KMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KMAR

KMAR Risk / Return Rank: 91
KMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
KMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
KMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
KMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLOO vs. KMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF (PLOO) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLOO	KMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.37	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.48	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.45	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.45	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.29	—

Drawdowns

PLOO vs. KMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLOO drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, which is greater than KMAR's maximum drawdown of -11.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOO and KMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLOO	KMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.59%	-11.32%	-22.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.26%	-0.24%	-24.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.20%	-1.29%	-15.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PLOO	KMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.75%	9.22%	+38.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.75%	11.92%	+35.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.75%	11.92%	+35.83%

PLOO vs. KMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLOO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KMAR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLOO vs. KMAR - Dividend Comparison

PLOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.57%, while KMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
KMAR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%
PLOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF	27.57%	22.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLOO and KMAR in my portfolio?

PLOO and KMAR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PLOO or KMAR?

On fees, KMAR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLOO or KMAR?

KMAR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PLOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLOO or KMAR?

PLOO has the higher dividend yield at 27.57%, compared with 0.00% for KMAR.

What is the main difference between PLOO and KMAR?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PLOO and 0.79% for KMAR.