PLOO vs. FBUF

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

PLOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLOO charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

PLOO vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF (PLOO) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLOO achieves a -17.21% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's 3.34% return.

PLOO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: -17.21%
• 6M: -18.24%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBUF

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: 3.34%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 15.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLOO vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF	-17.21%	1.60%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	3.34%	7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between PLOO and FBUF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

PLOO vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 67
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLOO vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF (PLOO) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLOO	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.88	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.52	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.39	—

Drawdowns

PLOO vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLOO drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOO and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLOO	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.59%	-11.09%	-22.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.26%	-2.09%	-22.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.74%	-1.38%	-15.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PLOO	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.26%	8.05%	+41.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.26%	9.67%	+39.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.26%	9.67%	+39.59%

PLOO vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLOO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLOO vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

PLOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.57%, more than FBUF's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.54%
PLOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF	27.57%	22.82%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLOO and FBUF in my portfolio?

PLOO and FBUF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PLOO or FBUF?

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLOO or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PLOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLOO or FBUF?

PLOO has the higher dividend yield at 27.57%, compared with 0.60% for FBUF.

What is the main difference between PLOO and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PLOO and 0.48% for FBUF.