PLMIX vs. EIDOX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PLMIX (PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund) and EIDOX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PLMIX returned 3.80%/yr vs 7.94%/yr for EIDOX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PLMIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for EIDOX.

Performance

PLMIX vs. EIDOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLMIX achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than EIDOX's 7.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PLMIX has underperformed EIDOX with an annualized return of 3.80%, while EIDOX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.94% annualized return.

PLMIX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: 3.61%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 11.01%
• 3Y*: 8.07%
• 5Y*: 4.66%
• 10Y*: 3.80%

EIDOX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.48%
• YTD: 7.62%
• 6M: 8.60%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 14.70%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 7.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLMIX vs. EIDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLMIX PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund	3.61%	17.29%	0.57%	9.01%	-4.12%	-2.76%	2.28%	6.21%	-4.43%	12.89%
EIDOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I	7.62%	15.59%	14.78%	11.40%	-6.25%	1.52%	7.39%	18.25%	-4.28%	12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PLMIX and EIDOX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.51

The correlation between PLMIX and EIDOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PLMIX vs. EIDOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLMIX

PLMIX Risk / Return Rank: 47
PLMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
PLMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PLMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PLMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PLMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

EIDOX

EIDOX Risk / Return Rank: 98
EIDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EIDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EIDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
EIDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EIDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLMIX vs. EIDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLMIX	EIDOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	5.64	-3.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	8.75	-6.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	2.53	-1.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	5.43	-3.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.75	22.01	-13.27

PLMIX vs. EIDOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the EIDOX Sharpe Ratio of 5.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLMIX and EIDOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLMIX vs. EIDOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLMIX drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, which is greater than EIDOX's maximum drawdown of -19.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLMIX and EIDOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLMIX	EIDOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-19.06%	-9.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.70%	-3.56%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.70%	-3.97%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.95%	-17.42%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.50%	-19.06%	+1.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-0.23%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-2.46%	-3.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	0.88%	+0.37%

Volatility

PLMIX vs. EIDOX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX) at 0.80%. This indicates that PLMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIDOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLMIX	EIDOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	0.80%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.96%	3.01%	+1.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.86%	3.44%	+2.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.03%	4.64%	+1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.32%	4.74%	+1.58%

PLMIX vs. EIDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLMIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EIDOX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLMIX vs. EIDOX - Dividend Comparison

PLMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, less than EIDOX's 10.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIDOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I	10.63%	9.41%	8.52%	8.97%	9.13%	7.82%	7.66%	7.81%	8.10%	7.85%	4.10%	0.00%
PLMIX PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund	8.43%	7.44%	7.08%	6.40%	1.97%	1.47%	1.63%	4.10%	12.65%	2.82%	2.88%	2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLMIX and EIDOX in my portfolio?

PLMIX and EIDOX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLMIX or EIDOX?

PLMIX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to EIDOX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLMIX dropped -28.76% vs EIDOX's -19.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIDOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.64 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.