PLIDX vs. ARINX

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

PLIDX (Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2) and ARINX (Archer Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, PLIDX returned 2.54%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for ARINX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PLIDX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for ARINX.

Performance

PLIDX vs. ARINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2 (PLIDX) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLIDX achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than ARINX's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PLIDX has outperformed ARINX with an annualized return of 2.54%, while ARINX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.05% annualized return.

PLIDX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.56%
• 6M: -0.80%
• YTD: -0.60%
• 1Y: 3.13%
• 3Y*: 4.36%
• 5Y*: 0.74%
• 10Y*: 2.54%
• ALL TIME*: 2.74%

ARINX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.27%
• 1Y: 2.63%
• 3Y*: 4.27%
• 5Y*: 1.18%
• 10Y*: 2.05%
• ALL TIME*: 2.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARINX Archer Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PLIDX Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PLIDX vs. ARINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLIDX Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2	-0.60%	7.26%	2.77%	8.35%	-12.15%	-0.21%	8.79%	11.30%	-1.73%	5.22%
ARINX Archer Income Fund	0.27%	4.42%	4.90%	3.99%	-6.84%	1.52%	4.29%	6.19%	0.35%	3.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PLIDX and ARINX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012	0.72

The correlation between PLIDX and ARINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PLIDX vs. ARINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLIDX

PLIDX Risk / Return Rank: 25
PLIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PLIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PLIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
PLIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
PLIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

ARINX

ARINX Risk / Return Rank: 47
ARINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ARINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ARINX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ARINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ARINX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLIDX vs. ARINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2 (PLIDX) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLIDX	ARINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.45	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	2.15	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.28	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	1.68	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.46	5.31	-1.85

PLIDX vs. ARINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLIDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the ARINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLIDX and ARINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLIDX vs. ARINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLIDX drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, which is greater than ARINX's maximum drawdown of -9.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLIDX and ARINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLIDX	ARINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.05%	-9.38%	-7.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.54%	-1.57%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.97%	-1.57%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.05%	-9.38%	-7.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.05%	-9.38%	-7.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.98%	-0.93%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.55%	-1.72%	-0.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.50%	+0.38%

Volatility

PLIDX vs. ARINX - Volatility Comparison

Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2 (PLIDX) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to Archer Income Fund (ARINX) at 0.55%. This indicates that PLIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLIDX	ARINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	0.55%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.70%	1.56%	+1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.50%	1.82%	+1.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.25%	2.09%	+3.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.55%	1.97%	+2.58%

PLIDX vs. ARINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLIDX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ARINX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLIDX vs. ARINX - Dividend Comparison

PLIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than ARINX's 3.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARINX Archer Income Fund	3.64%	2.72%	3.77%	3.15%	2.72%	2.56%	2.66%	2.69%	2.84%	2.94%	2.84%	2.79%
PLIDX Aristotle Core Income Fund Class I-2	4.77%	4.70%	4.86%	4.27%	3.31%	4.28%	3.03%	3.07%	3.50%	2.90%	2.91%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLIDX and ARINX in my portfolio?

PLIDX and ARINX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLIDX or ARINX?

PLIDX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to ARINX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLIDX dropped -17.05% vs ARINX's -9.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.