PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLFMX vs. POSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLFMX vs. POSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) and Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLFMX achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly higher than POSIX's 8.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PLFMX has outperformed POSIX with an annualized return of 15.12%, while POSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.44% annualized return.


PLFMX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.06%
YTD
9.46%
6M
8.46%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.12%

POSIX

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
8.05%
6M
8.06%
1Y
8.62%
3Y*
9.80%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
4.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLFMX vs. POSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLFMX
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund
9.46%17.10%26.06%25.27%-18.67%27.57%17.46%30.58%-5.14%20.96%
POSIX
Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund
8.05%7.57%0.67%10.87%-26.74%23.45%-3.91%24.53%-3.35%14.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PLFMX and POSIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2007

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between PLFMX and POSIX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLFMX vs. POSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLFMX
PLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

POSIX
POSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
POSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
POSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
POSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
POSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLFMX vs. POSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) and Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLFMXPOSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.15

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

1.00

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.00

3.58

+9.41

PLFMX vs. POSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLFMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the POSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLFMX and POSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLFMX vs. POSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLFMX drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, smaller than the maximum POSIX drawdown of -68.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFMX and POSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLFMXPOSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.62%

-68.45%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-9.97%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.83%

-18.02%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-34.15%

+9.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

-41.70%

+7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-4.94%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-13.90%

+3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.79%

-0.79%

Volatility

PLFMX vs. POSIX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX) at 3.88%. This indicates that PLFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLFMXPOSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

3.88%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

9.36%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

12.14%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

16.30%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

17.01%

+0.53%

PLFMX vs. POSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLFMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than POSIX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLFMX vs. POSIX - Dividend Comparison

PLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than POSIX's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLFMX
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund
2.20%2.41%3.77%3.62%2.28%13.02%7.02%3.28%6.80%6.44%2.66%2.07%
POSIX
Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund
2.44%2.64%2.57%2.63%1.12%2.40%1.13%6.32%3.81%4.16%3.70%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLFMX and POSIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLFMX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to POSIX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLFMX dropped -55.62% vs POSIX's -68.45%.

PLFMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLFMX and POSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer