PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLFMX vs. BSPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLFMX vs. BSPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Investor P Shares (BSPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PLFMX having a 11.40% return and BSPPX slightly higher at 11.54%.


PLFMX

1D
0.14%
1M
5.73%
YTD
11.40%
6M
11.42%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
14.99%

BSPPX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.77%
YTD
11.54%
6M
11.54%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLFMX vs. BSPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PLFMX
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund
11.40%17.10%26.06%25.27%-18.67%27.57%17.46%30.58%-13.74%
BSPPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Investor P Shares
11.54%17.46%24.54%25.85%-18.40%28.23%18.05%31.02%-13.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PLFMX and BSPPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.98

The correlation between PLFMX and BSPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLFMX vs. BSPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLFMX
PLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BSPPX
BSPPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BSPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BSPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLFMX vs. BSPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Investor P Shares (BSPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLFMXBSPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.45

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.28

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.99

15.31

-0.32

PLFMX vs. BSPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLFMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the BSPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLFMX and BSPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLFMXBSPPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.48

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.83

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.75

-0.31

Drawdowns

PLFMX vs. BSPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLFMX drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, which is greater than BSPPX's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFMX and BSPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLFMXBSPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.62%

-33.76%

-21.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-8.95%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.83%

-18.77%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-24.70%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-5.22%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.92%

+0.01%

Volatility

PLFMX vs. BSPPX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Investor P Shares (BSPPX) have volatilities of 2.82% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLFMXBSPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.82%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

8.97%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

11.85%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

16.88%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

19.73%

-2.24%

PLFMX vs. BSPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLFMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than BSPPX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLFMX vs. BSPPX - Dividend Comparison

PLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than BSPPX's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSPPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Investor P Shares
1.29%1.43%1.12%1.22%1.67%1.53%1.38%1.70%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLFMX
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund
2.16%2.41%3.77%3.62%2.28%13.02%7.02%3.28%6.80%6.44%2.66%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, PLFMX and BSPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BSPPX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to PLFMX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLFMX dropped -55.62% vs BSPPX's -33.76%.

BSPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLFMX and BSPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer