PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLFIX vs. TRSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLFIX vs. TRSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional (PLFIX) and Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PLFIX having a 11.68% return and TRSPX slightly lower at 11.56%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PLFIX having a 15.64% annualized return and TRSPX not far behind at 15.14%.


PLFIX

1D
0.14%
1M
5.79%
YTD
11.68%
6M
11.75%
1Y
28.92%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
14.45%
10Y*
15.64%

TRSPX

1D
0.12%
1M
5.77%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.55%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLFIX vs. TRSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLFIX
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional
11.68%17.77%26.77%26.00%-18.21%28.25%18.11%31.35%-4.66%21.65%
TRSPX
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class
11.56%17.50%24.64%25.90%-18.34%28.32%18.08%31.06%-4.72%19.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PLFIX and TRSPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2002

0.99

The correlation between PLFIX and TRSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLFIX vs. TRSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLFIX
PLFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PLFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TRSPX
TRSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TRSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLFIX vs. TRSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional (PLFIX) and Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLFIXTRSPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.49

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

3.39

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.31

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.63

15.39

+0.24

PLFIX vs. TRSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the TRSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLFIX and TRSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLFIXTRSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.49

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.83

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.84

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.58

-0.09

Drawdowns

PLFIX vs. TRSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLFIX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, roughly equal to the maximum TRSPX drawdown of -55.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFIX and TRSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLFIXTRSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.28%

-55.34%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.94%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

-18.76%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

-24.63%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.77%

-33.77%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-6.90%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.91%

-0.01%

Volatility

PLFIX vs. TRSPX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional (PLFIX) and Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX) have volatilities of 2.82% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLFIXTRSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.82%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.96%

8.98%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

11.87%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

16.88%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

18.06%

-0.54%

PLFIX vs. TRSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLFIX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than TRSPX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLFIX vs. TRSPX - Dividend Comparison

PLFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than TRSPX's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLFIX
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional
2.64%2.95%4.28%4.13%2.96%13.60%7.57%3.83%7.52%7.01%3.23%2.69%
TRSPX
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class
1.93%2.15%1.30%1.26%1.66%1.55%1.33%1.95%2.67%0.36%2.18%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, PLFIX and TRSPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRSPX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to PLFIX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLFIX dropped -55.28% vs TRSPX's -55.34%.

PLFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLFIX and TRSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer