PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLDTX vs. FUMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLDTX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Low Duration II Fund (PLDTX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLDTX achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly higher than FUMBX's -0.01% return.


PLDTX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.45%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
1.79%

FUMBX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.26%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
0.34%
1Y
2.69%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
1.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLDTX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLDTX
PIMCO Low Duration II Fund
0.01%5.47%4.55%4.21%-5.14%-1.03%3.44%3.83%0.63%0.15%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.01%5.83%3.25%4.47%-5.84%-1.38%4.22%4.19%1.47%-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PLDTX and FUMBX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.77

The correlation between PLDTX and FUMBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLDTX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLDTX
PLDTX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PLDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PLDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FUMBX
FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLDTX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Low Duration II Fund (PLDTX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLDTXFUMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.82

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

5.33

+2.69

PLDTX vs. FUMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLDTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FUMBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLDTX and FUMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLDTX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLDTX drawdown since its inception was -7.60%, smaller than the maximum FUMBX drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLDTX and FUMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLDTXFUMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-8.83%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-1.54%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.49%

-1.57%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.50%

-8.60%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.96%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-1.85%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.52%

-0.12%

Volatility

PLDTX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Low Duration II Fund (PLDTX) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) at 0.71%. This indicates that PLDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLDTXFUMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

0.71%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

1.56%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08%

2.08%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.41%

2.93%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.97%

2.49%

-0.52%

PLDTX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDTX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLDTX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison

PLDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than FUMBX's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.77%3.51%2.91%1.64%0.86%1.15%1.41%1.88%1.64%0.34%0.00%0.00%
PLDTX
PIMCO Low Duration II Fund
3.81%3.79%3.99%3.55%1.28%0.29%1.23%2.72%2.18%1.45%1.76%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLDTX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLDTX has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to FUMBX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLDTX dropped -7.60% vs FUMBX's -8.83%.

PLDTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLDTX and FUMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer