PLDI.TO vs. CAGS.TO
PLDI.TO (PIMCO Low Duration Monthly Income Fund (Canada)) and CAGS.TO (CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. PLDI.TO is actively managed, while CAGS.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PLDI.TO returned 2.95%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for CAGS.TO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLDI.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLDI.TO achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than CAGS.TO's 1.08% return.
PLDI.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.24%
CAGS.TO
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 3.06%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$30.66K | CA$35.15K | CA$39.40K | |
| CA$140.89K | CA$154.04K | CA$132.61K |
PLDI.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLDI.TO PIMCO Low Duration Monthly Income Fund (Canada) | -0.39% | 6.61% | 5.93% | 5.62% | -2.88% | 2.21% | 3.11% | 4.33% |
CAGS.TO CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.08% | 3.95% | 6.07% | 5.02% | -4.30% | -1.22% | 4.47% | 3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLDI.TO and CAGS.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLDI.TO vs. CAGS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PLDI.TO
CAGS.TO
PLDI.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Low Duration Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PLDI.TO) and CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLDI.TO | CAGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.30 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 2.30 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.91 | 6.90 | -2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLDI.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLDI.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum CAGS.TO drawdown of -11.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLDI.TO and CAGS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLDI.TO | CAGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -11.60% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.03% | -1.33% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.55% | -1.33% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.56% | -7.58% | +2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.38% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -1.45% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.44% | +0.25% |
Volatility
PLDI.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Low Duration Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PLDI.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGS.TO) at 0.65%. This indicates that PLDI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAGS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLDI.TO | CAGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 0.65% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.51% | 1.64% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 2.07% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 2.76% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.24% | 4.62% | -0.38% |
Dividends
PLDI.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Dividend Comparison
PLDI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than CAGS.TO's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAGS.TO CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.28% | 3.16% | 3.37% | 2.62% | 2.61% | 1.96% | 2.59% | 2.83% | 2.72% | 1.06% |
PLDI.TO PIMCO Low Duration Monthly Income Fund (Canada) | 3.56% | 4.36% | 7.04% | 5.80% | 3.29% | 2.04% | 4.78% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLDI.TO and CAGS.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: PIMCO Canada Corp. and CI.
Find the right allocation for PLDI.TO and CAGS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer