PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLAN.L vs. V3GD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLAN.L vs. V3GD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PLAN.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PLAN.L is traded in EUR, while V3GD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the V3GD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLAN.L achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than V3GD.L's 1.76% return.


PLAN.L

1D
0.40%
1M
0.04%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
0.06%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
6.88%
5Y*
10Y*

V3GD.L

1D
0.07%
1M
1.40%
YTD
1.76%
6M
1.08%
1Y
2.78%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLAN.L vs. V3GD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLAN.L
Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
-0.73%13.85%-0.01%10.42%-18.13%-4.42%
V3GD.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing
1.76%-6.34%10.79%5.37%-7.89%2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PLAN.L and V3GD.L is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021

-0.18

The correlation between PLAN.L and V3GD.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to -0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLAN.L vs. V3GD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLAN.L
PLAN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PLAN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

V3GD.L
V3GD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
V3GD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLAN.L vs. V3GD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PLAN.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLAN.LV3GD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.08

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

0.70

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

1.95

+0.49

PLAN.L vs. V3GD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLAN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the V3GD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLAN.L and V3GD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLAN.LV3GD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.46

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.27

-0.34

Drawdowns

PLAN.L vs. V3GD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLAN.L drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, which is greater than V3GD.L's maximum drawdown of -11.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLAN.L and V3GD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLAN.LV3GD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.76%

-11.47%

-17.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.78%

-3.97%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.93%

-10.94%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-5.94%

+3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.55%

-4.95%

-7.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.43%

+0.17%

Volatility

PLAN.L vs. V3GD.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PLAN.L) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L) at 1.18%. This indicates that PLAN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V3GD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLAN.LV3GD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

1.18%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.85%

4.42%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.29%

6.01%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

8.17%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.13%

8.16%

-0.03%

PLAN.L vs. V3GD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLAN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than V3GD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PLAN.L vs. V3GD.L - Dividend Comparison

PLAN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while V3GD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PLAN.L
Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
V3GD.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing
4.37%4.45%4.35%4.05%2.44%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLAN.L and V3GD.L have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3GD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3GD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PLAN.L.

PLAN.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while V3GD.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PLAN.L and 0.15% for V3GD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLAN.L and V3GD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer