PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJIZX vs. LIAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJIZX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions International Equity Fund (PJIZX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJIZX achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 27.26% return.


PJIZX

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.80%
YTD
16.81%
6M
20.02%
1Y
38.48%
3Y*
26.69%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
10.87%

LIAGX

1D
-0.41%
1M
7.53%
YTD
27.26%
6M
28.28%
1Y
39.81%
3Y*
21.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJIZX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PJIZX
PGIM Quant Solutions International Equity Fund
16.81%41.41%10.78%19.44%-17.70%-1.12%
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
27.26%25.09%9.43%15.73%-26.63%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PJIZX and LIAGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021

0.91

The correlation between PJIZX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJIZX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJIZX
PJIZX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PJIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PJIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

LIAGX
LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJIZX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions International Equity Fund (PJIZX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJIZXLIAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.36

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

2.83

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

11.39

+1.69

PJIZX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJIZX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJIZXLIAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.00

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.44

-0.28

Drawdowns

PJIZX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJIZX drawdown since its inception was -67.75%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJIZX and LIAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJIZXLIAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.75%

-37.87%

-29.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-14.56%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-17.11%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.41%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-13.23%

-10.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.62%

-0.60%

Volatility

PJIZX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions International Equity Fund (PJIZX) is 5.68%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that PJIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJIZXLIAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

8.33%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

17.98%

-4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

20.66%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

18.79%

-3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.89%

18.79%

-2.90%

PJIZX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJIZX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJIZX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

PJIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIAGX
Lord Abbett International Growth Fund
0.30%0.38%0.48%0.71%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJIZX
PGIM Quant Solutions International Equity Fund
8.60%10.05%4.25%4.25%4.11%11.66%1.74%2.73%3.46%1.98%2.28%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PJIZX and LIAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LIAGX has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to PJIZX (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJIZX dropped -67.75% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

PJIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJIZX and LIAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer