PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJGZX vs. PDBZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJGZX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund (PJGZX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJGZX achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PJGZX has outperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 13.74%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.88% annualized return.


PJGZX

1D
0.72%
1M
3.98%
YTD
14.88%
6M
15.18%
1Y
34.77%
3Y*
27.46%
5Y*
15.35%
10Y*
13.74%

PDBZX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJGZX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJGZX
PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund
14.88%17.64%35.33%16.78%-10.83%27.74%1.23%30.70%-13.73%16.17%
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
0.72%7.70%2.87%7.70%-14.33%-1.46%8.01%14.76%-0.72%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PJGZX and PDBZX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 1996

-0.11

The correlation between PJGZX and PDBZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJGZX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJGZX
PJGZX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PJGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PJGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBZX
PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJGZX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund (PJGZX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJGZXPDBZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.27

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

2.09

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.07

6.21

+14.86

PJGZX vs. PDBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJGZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the PDBZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJGZX and PDBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJGZXPDBZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

1.44

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.15

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.54

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.09

-0.51

Drawdowns

PJGZX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJGZX drawdown since its inception was -57.87%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJGZX and PDBZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJGZXPDBZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.87%

-20.88%

-36.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-3.00%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.01%

-5.51%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.91%

-20.81%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.37%

-20.88%

-15.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.29%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-2.31%

-5.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.01%

+0.69%

Volatility

PJGZX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund (PJGZX) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) at 2.08%. This indicates that PJGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJGZXPDBZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

2.08%

+2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

3.30%

+6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

4.35%

+7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

6.05%

+10.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

5.37%

+13.01%

PJGZX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJGZX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJGZX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison

PJGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, more than PDBZX's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
4.57%4.54%4.79%4.60%5.73%2.73%2.94%10.36%4.01%2.87%3.92%3.33%
PJGZX
PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund
7.78%8.93%16.50%9.49%3.38%4.44%1.07%15.50%18.64%14.29%7.82%8.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJGZX and PDBZX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJGZX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to PDBZX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJGZX dropped -57.87% vs PDBZX's -20.88%.

PJGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJGZX and PDBZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer