PJFAX vs. TRLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX).
PJFAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Nov 2, 1995. TRLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 2001.
Performance
PJFAX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PJFAX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJFAX PGIM Jennison Growth Fund | -11.09% | 14.53% | 48.10% | 52.76% | -37.89% | 15.65% | 55.66% | 45.04% | -1.24% | 36.41% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | -11.46% | 17.51% | 37.57% | 46.22% | -35.26% | 23.24% | 39.57% | 28.51% | 4.35% | 37.77% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PJFAX having a -11.09% return and TRLGX slightly lower at -11.46%. Over the past 10 years, PJFAX has outperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 17.93%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.72% annualized return.
PJFAX
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -11.09%
- 6M
- -10.65%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.93%
TRLGX
- 1D
- 3.95%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 6M
- -10.30%
- 1Y
- 12.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 16.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PJFAX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJFAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PJFAX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank
PJFAX
TRLGX
PJFAX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJFAX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.14 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 0.55 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.47 | 1.83 | +0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJFAX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.43 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.77 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.55 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between PJFAX and TRLGX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PJFAX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison
PJFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.09%, less than TRLGX's 15.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJFAX PGIM Jennison Growth Fund | 15.09% | 13.42% | 24.62% | 7.23% | 2.77% | 14.67% | 9.02% | 16.27% | 6.06% | 5.85% | 4.12% | 6.90% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | 15.46% | 13.69% | 9.80% | 2.04% | 3.88% | 2.56% | 0.42% | 4.09% | 7.93% | 9.27% | 1.64% | 4.71% |
Drawdowns
PJFAX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJFAX drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than TRLGX's maximum drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFAX and TRLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJFAX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.07% | -55.56% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | -18.18% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.56% | -40.44% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | -40.44% | -3.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.72% | -14.94% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.44% | -8.71% | -11.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.25% | 5.43% | -0.18% |
Volatility
PJFAX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) have volatilities of 6.98% and 7.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PJFAX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.98% | 7.19% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 12.51% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 22.17% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 22.41% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.97% | 21.73% | +2.24% |