PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJEZX vs. MNTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJEZX vs. MNTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Real Estate Fund (PJEZX) and Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJEZX achieves a 16.61% return, which is significantly higher than MNTRX's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PJEZX has outperformed MNTRX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while MNTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.40% annualized return.


PJEZX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.18%
YTD
16.61%
6M
16.76%
1Y
18.59%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
9.27%

MNTRX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.90%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
1.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJEZX vs. MNTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJEZX
PGIM US Real Estate Fund
16.61%2.49%13.08%15.85%-27.26%48.32%-4.86%44.30%-3.54%5.60%
MNTRX
Allspring Core Bond Fund
0.29%7.16%1.38%5.37%-13.82%-2.10%8.51%8.18%-0.57%3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PJEZX and MNTRX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2010

0.11

Over the past year, PJEZX and MNTRX have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJEZX vs. MNTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJEZX
PJEZX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PJEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PJEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MNTRX
MNTRX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MNTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MNTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJEZX vs. MNTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Real Estate Fund (PJEZX) and Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PJEZXMNTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.56

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.29

4.59

+2.69

PJEZX vs. MNTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJEZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the MNTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJEZX and MNTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PJEZX vs. MNTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJEZX drawdown since its inception was -43.43%, which is greater than MNTRX's maximum drawdown of -19.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJEZX and MNTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJEZXMNTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.43%

-19.36%

-24.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.32%

-3.06%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-6.27%

-12.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.60%

-18.91%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.43%

-19.36%

-24.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-3.14%

+2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.10%

-2.46%

-5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

1.04%

+1.44%

Volatility

PJEZX vs. MNTRX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Real Estate Fund (PJEZX) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) at 1.35%. This indicates that PJEZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJEZXMNTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

1.35%

+3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

2.93%

+7.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.74%

3.95%

+9.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

6.04%

+12.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.16%

4.96%

+16.20%

PJEZX vs. MNTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJEZX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MNTRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJEZX vs. MNTRX - Dividend Comparison

PJEZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than MNTRX's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNTRX
Allspring Core Bond Fund
4.06%4.07%4.13%3.19%1.85%1.75%6.35%2.46%2.33%1.74%1.97%1.45%
PJEZX
PGIM US Real Estate Fund
1.79%2.05%1.93%1.65%3.21%9.54%1.56%13.21%5.43%6.31%15.48%9.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJEZX and MNTRX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJEZX has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to MNTRX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJEZX dropped -43.43% vs MNTRX's -19.36%.

PJEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJEZX and MNTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer