PJBF vs. LENS
PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) and LENS (Sarmaya Thematic ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. PJBF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LENS.
Performance
PJBF vs. LENS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PJBF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LENS
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -8.59%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 37.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJBF vs. LENS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% |
LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF | -1.58% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJBF vs. LENS — Risk / Return Rank
PJBF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LENS
PJBF vs. LENS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PJBF | LENS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PJBF vs. LENS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJBF drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum LENS drawdown of -24.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJBF and LENS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJBF | LENS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -24.55% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -23.57% | +23.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -5.05% | +5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.43% | — |
Volatility
PJBF vs. LENS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJBF | LENS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 27.94% | -27.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 25.68% | -25.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 25.68% | -25.68% |
PJBF vs. LENS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJBF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than LENS's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJBF vs. LENS - Dividend Comparison
PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LENS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF | 1.59% | 1.60% |
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PJBF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PJBF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LENS.
LENS has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Sarmaya Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PJBF and 0.79% for LENS.
Find the right allocation for PJBF and LENS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer