PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJBF vs. LENS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJBF vs. LENS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PJBF

1D
0.00%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LENS

1D
-2.14%
1M
-8.59%
6M
-11.03%
YTD
0.29%
1Y
37.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJBF vs. LENS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJBF vs. LENS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJBF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LENS
LENS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
LENS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LENS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LENS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LENS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LENS Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJBF vs. LENS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PJBFLENSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

PJBF vs. LENS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PJBF vs. LENS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJBF drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum LENS drawdown of -24.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJBF and LENS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJBFLENSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-24.55%

+24.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-23.57%

+23.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-5.05%

+5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.43%

Volatility

PJBF vs. LENS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJBFLENSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

27.94%

-27.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

25.68%

-25.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

25.68%

-25.68%

PJBF vs. LENS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJBF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than LENS's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJBF vs. LENS - Dividend Comparison

PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LENS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.


PositionTTM2025
LENS
Sarmaya Thematic ETF
1.59%1.60%
PJBF
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, PJBF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PJBF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LENS.

LENS has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Sarmaya Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PJBF and 0.79% for LENS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJBF and LENS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer