PJBF vs. GSWO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO).

PJBF and GSWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PJBF is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023. GSWO is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Mar 15, 2022.

Performance

PJBF vs. GSWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PJBF vs. GSWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	-11.38%	5.13%	19.91%	-0.80%
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF	-2.17%	18.97%	15.29%	0.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJBF achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than GSWO's -2.17% return.

PJBF

• 1D: 4.21%
• 1M: -5.84%
• YTD: -11.38%
• 6M: -10.75%
• 1Y: 5.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSWO

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: -5.76%
• YTD: -2.17%
• 6M: -0.46%
• 1Y: 11.32%
• 3Y*: 14.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJBF vs. GSWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJBF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GSWO's 0.25% expense ratio.

PJBF

PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF

GSWO

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF

Return for Risk

PJBF vs. GSWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJBF

PJBF Risk / Return Rank: 18
PJBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
PJBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
PJBF Omega Ratio Rank: 18
PJBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PJBF Martin Ratio Rank: 17

GSWO

GSWO Risk / Return Rank: 48
GSWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GSWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GSWO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GSWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
GSWO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJBF vs. GSWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PJBF	GSWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	0.84	-0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	1.24	-0.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.18	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.24	1.24	-1.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.80	5.62	-4.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PJBF vs. GSWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the GSWO Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJBF and GSWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PJBF	GSWO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	0.84	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.77	-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between PJBF and GSWO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PJBF vs. GSWO - Dividend Comparison

PJBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than GSWO's 1.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.27%	0.24%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF	1.83%	1.74%	1.75%	2.06%	1.73%

Drawdowns

PJBF vs. GSWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJBF drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, which is greater than GSWO's maximum drawdown of -17.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJBF and GSWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PJBF	GSWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.67%	-17.77%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.41%	-9.50%	-8.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.98%	-6.31%	-8.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-3.35%	-2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.50%	2.10%	+3.40%

Volatility

PJBF vs. GSWO - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) has a higher volatility of 8.67% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) at 5.76%. This indicates that PJBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PJBF	GSWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.67%	5.76%	+2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.98%	8.20%	+6.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.29%	13.60%	+8.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.31%	12.98%	+8.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.31%	12.98%	+8.33%