PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJBF vs. FYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJBF vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PJBF

1D
0.00%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FYLD

1D
-0.35%
1M
-0.76%
6M
14.09%
YTD
18.20%
1Y
34.06%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJBF vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


PJBF vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJBF
FYLD

Technology

40.0%
3.0%

Industrials

16.5%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.8%
11.8%

Communication Services

11.5%
5.0%

Healthcare

11.5%

-

Financial Services

2.5%
22.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
7.9%

Utilities

2.0%
4.0%

Basic Materials

-

7.9%

Energy

-

23.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

PJBF
40.0%
FYLD
3.0%

Industrials

PJBF
16.5%
FYLD
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PJBF
13.8%
FYLD
11.8%

Communication Services

PJBF
11.5%
FYLD
5.0%

Healthcare

PJBF
11.5%
FYLD

-

Financial Services

PJBF
2.5%
FYLD
22.3%

Consumer Defensive

PJBF
2.3%
FYLD
7.9%

Utilities

PJBF
2.0%
FYLD
4.0%

Basic Materials

PJBF

-

FYLD
7.9%

Energy

PJBF

-

FYLD
23.6%

Real Estate

PJBF

-

FYLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJBF vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJBF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FYLD
FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJBF vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PJBFFYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.05

PJBF vs. FYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PJBF vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJBF drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJBF and FYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJBFFYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-44.55%

+44.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.80%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-8.78%

+8.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

Volatility

PJBF vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJBFFYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

12.13%

-12.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

16.25%

-16.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

17.74%

-17.74%

PJBF vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PJBF and FYLD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

PJBF vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison

PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
3.41%4.07%5.41%6.06%6.13%4.74%3.94%3.73%5.17%2.85%2.72%3.98%
PJBF
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PJBF and FYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Cambria.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJBF and FYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer