PISIX vs. LIAGX
PISIX (PIMCO StocksPLUS International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, PISIX returned 16.85%/yr vs 21.75%/yr for LIAGX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PISIX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.
Performance
PISIX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PISIX achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 27.78% return.
PISIX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
LIAGX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 10.09%
- YTD
- 27.78%
- 6M
- 28.66%
- 1Y
- 41.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PISIX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PISIX PIMCO StocksPLUS International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 9.70% | 17.68% | 14.87% | 21.70% | -8.86% | 4.27% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 27.78% | 25.09% | 9.43% | 15.73% | -26.63% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between PISIX and LIAGX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PISIX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank
PISIX
LIAGX
PISIX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PISIX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PISIX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.82 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 11.32 | -4.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PISIX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.99 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.45 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
PISIX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PISIX drawdown since its inception was -57.47%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PISIX and LIAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PISIX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.47% | -37.87% | -19.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -14.56% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.21% | -17.11% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -13.24% | +6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.62% | -0.62% |
Volatility
PISIX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO StocksPLUS International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PISIX) is 3.75%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that PISIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PISIX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 8.29% | -4.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.76% | 18.01% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 20.68% | -6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 18.79% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 18.79% | -4.18% |
PISIX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PISIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
PISIX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison
PISIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PISIX PIMCO StocksPLUS International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 4.69% | 5.14% | 11.81% | 10.04% | 10.11% | 7.31% | 1.42% | 11.47% | 7.99% | 7.36% | 1.02% | 8.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PISIX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIAGX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to PISIX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PISIX dropped -57.47% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.
LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PISIX and LIAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer