PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIMSX vs. CMFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIMSX vs. CMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector S/T Bd I (PIMSX) and CM Advisors Fixed Income Fund (CMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIMSX achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than CMFIX's 0.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PIMSX having a 3.16% annualized return and CMFIX not far ahead at 3.18%.


PIMSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.66%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
6.15%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
3.16%

CMFIX

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.02%
1Y
7.64%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
3.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIMSX vs. CMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIMSX
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector S/T Bd I
1.47%6.08%5.90%7.16%-5.52%0.20%4.58%6.40%-0.53%3.93%
CMFIX
CM Advisors Fixed Income Fund
0.90%7.75%4.55%12.38%-3.67%3.06%0.88%2.82%-1.63%2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PIMSX and CMFIX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2008

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIMSX vs. CMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIMSX
PIMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PIMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CMFIX
CMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIMSX vs. CMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector S/T Bd I (PIMSX) and CM Advisors Fixed Income Fund (CMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIMSXCMFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.56

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

4.68

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.09

18.20

-2.11

PIMSX vs. CMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the CMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIMSX and CMFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIMSXCMFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.94

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

1.05

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

1.00

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.82

+0.48

Drawdowns

PIMSX vs. CMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIMSX drawdown since its inception was -18.10%, which is greater than CMFIX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIMSX and CMFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIMSXCMFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.10%

-15.96%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.30%

-1.64%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.30%

-3.65%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.06%

-4.81%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.69%

-4.81%

-5.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.56%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-1.04%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

0.42%

-0.10%

Volatility

PIMSX vs. CMFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector S/T Bd I (PIMSX) is 1.00%, while CM Advisors Fixed Income Fund (CMFIX) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that PIMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIMSXCMFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

1.86%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

2.37%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

3.96%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.72%

4.16%

-1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.72%

3.19%

-0.47%

PIMSX vs. CMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIMSX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CMFIX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIMSX vs. CMFIX - Dividend Comparison

PIMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, less than CMFIX's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMFIX
CM Advisors Fixed Income Fund
4.80%3.28%3.91%4.21%1.33%2.49%1.63%2.23%3.34%3.74%3.50%1.85%
PIMSX
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector S/T Bd I
4.65%4.77%4.60%3.66%2.77%1.89%2.92%3.18%3.16%3.23%3.16%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIMSX and CMFIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMFIX has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to PIMSX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIMSX dropped -18.10% vs CMFIX's -15.96%.

PIMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIMSX and CMFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer