PIGDX vs. SWRLX
PIGDX (Federated Hermes International Growth Fund) and SWRLX (Touchstone International Equity Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PIGDX returned -24.69%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for SWRLX. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PIGDX charges 0.84%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for SWRLX.
Performance
PIGDX vs. SWRLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIGDX achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly lower than SWRLX's 21.39% return.
PIGDX
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- -73.43%
- 3Y*
- -31.63%
- 5Y*
- -24.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.31%
SWRLX
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 1Y
- 45.70%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PIGDX vs. SWRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIGDX Federated Hermes International Growth Fund | 10.51% | -72.44% | 6.47% | 8.80% | -29.43% | 6.85% | 43.18% | 26.99% | -13.33% | 41.55% |
SWRLX Touchstone International Equity Fund | 21.39% | 53.78% | -1.53% | 17.63% | -11.02% | 3.86% | 7.47% | 25.87% | -16.81% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIGDX and SWRLX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PIGDX and SWRLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIGDX vs. SWRLX — Risk / Return Rank
PIGDX
SWRLX
PIGDX vs. SWRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes International Growth Fund (PIGDX) and Touchstone International Equity Fund (SWRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIGDX | SWRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.64 | 1.52 | -0.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 3.88 | -4.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 13.62 | -14.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIGDX vs. SWRLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIGDX drawdown since its inception was -79.94%, which is greater than SWRLX's maximum drawdown of -59.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGDX and SWRLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIGDX | SWRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.94% | -59.44% | -20.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.87% | -11.49% | -67.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.87% | -14.08% | -64.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.94% | -34.19% | -45.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.31% | -2.56% | -74.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -11.58% | -6.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.49% | 3.27% | +54.22% |
Volatility
PIGDX vs. SWRLX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes International Growth Fund (PIGDX) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Touchstone International Equity Fund (SWRLX) at 5.46%. This indicates that PIGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIGDX | SWRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 5.46% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.97% | 13.85% | +3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.30% | 15.77% | +66.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.27% | 17.67% | +21.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.87% | 16.65% | +14.22% |
PIGDX vs. SWRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIGDX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than SWRLX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIGDX vs. SWRLX - Dividend Comparison
PIGDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIGDX Federated Hermes International Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 2.03% | 3.98% | 4.51% | 4.64% | 16.19% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWRLX Touchstone International Equity Fund | 6.29% | 7.63% | 10.53% | 1.36% | 1.56% | 14.95% | 0.46% | 9.10% | 15.19% | 3.61% | 0.66% | 3.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIGDX and SWRLX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIGDX has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to SWRLX (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIGDX dropped -79.94% vs SWRLX's -59.44%.
SWRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIGDX and SWRLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer