PIGDX vs. QILGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PIGDX (Federated Hermes International Growth Fund) and QILGX (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - PIGDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Federated, while QILGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 5 years, PIGDX returned -23.11%/yr vs 18.99%/yr for QILGX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIGDX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QILGX.

Performance

PIGDX vs. QILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes International Growth Fund (PIGDX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIGDX achieves a 18.46% return, which is significantly higher than QILGX's 9.41% return.

PIGDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 6.21%
• YTD: 18.46%
• 6M: -72.82%
• 1Y: -71.45%
• 3Y*: -29.41%
• 5Y*: -23.11%
• 10Y*: —

QILGX

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 6.98%
• YTD: 9.41%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 27.95%
• 3Y*: 28.56%
• 5Y*: 18.99%
• 10Y*: 20.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIGDX vs. QILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PIGDX Federated Hermes International Growth Fund	18.46%	-72.44%	6.47%	8.80%	-29.43%	6.85%	43.18%	26.99%	-13.33%	41.55%
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund	9.41%	19.46%	40.83%	39.63%	-24.86%	30.46%	38.39%	32.01%	1.52%	24.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PIGDX and QILGX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between PIGDX and QILGX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PIGDX vs. QILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIGDX

PIGDX Risk / Return Rank: 0
PIGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
PIGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PIGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
PIGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
PIGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

QILGX

QILGX Risk / Return Rank: 32
QILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
QILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
QILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
QILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIGDX vs. QILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes International Growth Fund (PIGDX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PIGDX	QILGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	1.75	-2.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.73	2.44	-3.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.65	1.36	-0.70
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	1.80	-2.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.43	5.79	-7.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PIGDX vs. QILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIGDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the QILGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIGDX and QILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PIGDX	QILGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.91	1.75	-2.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.60	0.91	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.96	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	0.61	-0.76

Drawdowns

PIGDX vs. QILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIGDX drawdown since its inception was -79.94%, which is greater than QILGX's maximum drawdown of -53.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGDX and QILGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIGDX	QILGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.94%	-53.48%	-26.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.87%	-15.55%	-63.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.87%	-24.71%	-54.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.94%	-30.05%	-49.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.67%	-0.30%	-75.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.05%	-8.96%	-8.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.83%	4.83%	+44.00%

Volatility

PIGDX vs. QILGX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes International Growth Fund (PIGDX) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) at 3.17%. This indicates that PIGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIGDX	QILGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	3.17%	+2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	146.99%	13.02%	+133.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.10%	16.02%	+66.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.05%	21.04%	+18.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.96%	21.25%	+9.71%

PIGDX vs. QILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIGDX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than QILGX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIGDX vs. QILGX - Dividend Comparison

PIGDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PIGDX Federated Hermes International Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	1.98%	1.24%	2.03%	3.98%	4.51%	4.64%	16.19%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund	2.83%	3.09%	6.60%	1.47%	13.57%	19.44%	7.47%	5.07%	10.33%	7.40%	0.55%	11.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIGDX and QILGX in my portfolio?

PIGDX and QILGX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PIGDX or QILGX?

PIGDX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to QILGX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIGDX dropped -79.94% vs QILGX's -53.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QILGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.