PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIFZX vs. PDBZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIFZX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (PIFZX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIFZX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PIFZX has underperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 2.50%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.85% annualized return.


PIFZX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
2.50%

PDBZX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.68%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
5.28%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
2.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIFZX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIFZX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z
0.60%6.66%4.47%6.20%-6.85%-0.60%5.44%6.76%0.62%2.23%
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
0.47%7.70%2.87%7.70%-14.33%-1.46%8.01%14.76%-0.72%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PIFZX and PDBZX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1996

0.78

The correlation between PIFZX and PDBZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIFZX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIFZX
PIFZX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PIFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PIFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBZX
PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIFZX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (PIFZX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIFZXPDBZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.25

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.00

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

5.92

+3.85

PIFZX vs. PDBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIFZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the PDBZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIFZX and PDBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIFZXPDBZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.38

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.13

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.53

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

1.09

+0.35

Drawdowns

PIFZX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIFZX drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum PDBZX drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIFZX and PDBZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIFZXPDBZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-20.88%

+10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.74%

-3.00%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.74%

-5.51%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.46%

-20.81%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.46%

-20.88%

+10.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-1.54%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-2.31%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

1.01%

-0.54%

Volatility

PIFZX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (PIFZX) is 0.78%, while PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) has a volatility of 2.06%. This indicates that PIFZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIFZXPDBZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

2.06%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.64%

3.28%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24%

4.35%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.93%

6.05%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.68%

5.37%

-2.69%

PIFZX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIFZX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIFZX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison

PIFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than PDBZX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
4.58%4.54%4.79%4.60%5.73%2.73%2.94%10.36%4.01%2.87%3.92%3.33%
PIFZX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z
4.12%3.99%3.22%2.85%2.24%1.99%2.49%2.85%2.83%2.77%2.65%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIFZX and PDBZX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBZX has higher volatility (2.06%) compared to PIFZX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIFZX dropped -10.46% vs PDBZX's -20.88%.

PIFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIFZX and PDBZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer