PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PIFZX vs. HOBEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PIFZX vs. HOBEX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PIFZX (PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z) and HOBEX (Holbrook Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PIFZX returned 1.98%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for HOBEX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIFZX charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for HOBEX.

Performance

PIFZX vs. HOBEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (PIFZX) and Holbrook Income Fund (HOBEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIFZX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than HOBEX's 1.91% return.

PIFZX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.85%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
2.46%

HOBEX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.91%
6M
2.93%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
6.47%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIFZX vs. HOBEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIFZX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z		0.42%6.66%4.47%6.20%-6.85%-0.60%5.44%6.76%0.62%2.23%
HOBEX
Holbrook Income Fund		1.91%7.23%7.16%4.74%-3.42%6.25%6.83%7.30%1.26%2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PIFZX and HOBEX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z

Holbrook Income Fund

Often compared with PIFZX:
PIFZX vs. PIMSXPIFZX vs. FPNIXPIFZX vs. SDMZXPIFZX vs. DFEQXPIFZX vs. DFCFXPIFZX vs. VFIDXPIFZX vs. DFAIX
Often compared with HOBEX:
HOBEX vs. PONPXHOBEX vs. PEYHOBEX vs. FDFIXHOBEX vs. HOBIXHOBEX vs. BINCHOBEX vs. PULSHOBEX vs. PQIPX

Return for Risk

PIFZX vs. HOBEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PIFZX
PIFZX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PIFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PIFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
HOBEX
HOBEX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HOBEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOBEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOBEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HOBEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOBEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIFZX vs. HOBEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (PIFZX) and Holbrook Income Fund (HOBEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

PIFZXHOBEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.82
2.74

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.04
7.16

-4.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

2.43

-1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

9.35

-7.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

33.09

-24.63

PIFZX vs. HOBEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIFZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the HOBEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIFZX and HOBEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIFZX vs. HOBEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIFZX drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum HOBEX drawdown of -23.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIFZX and HOBEX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PIFZXHOBEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-23.58%

+13.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.74%

-0.61%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.74%

-2.74%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.46%

-4.57%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.46%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.20%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-1.06%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.17%

+0.31%

Volatility

PIFZX vs. HOBEX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z (PIFZX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Holbrook Income Fund (HOBEX) at 0.48%. This indicates that PIFZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOBEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PIFZXHOBEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.48%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

1.53%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26%

2.07%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

2.61%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.68%

5.71%

-3.03%

PIFZX vs. HOBEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIFZX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than HOBEX's 1.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIFZX vs. HOBEX - Dividend Comparison

PIFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than HOBEX's 5.81% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HOBEX
Holbrook Income Fund		5.81%5.94%6.58%5.05%4.83%4.00%5.44%3.05%3.84%1.69%0.00%0.00%
PIFZX
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund Class Z		4.13%3.99%3.22%2.85%2.24%1.99%2.49%2.85%2.83%2.77%2.65%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

PIFZX and HOBEX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIFZX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to HOBEX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIFZX dropped -10.46% vs HOBEX's -23.58%.

HOBEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIFZX and HOBEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer