PIFI vs. WTBN
PIFI (ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF) and WTBN (WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. PIFI is actively managed, while WTBN is passively managed. Over the past year, PIFI returned 3.35% vs 3.86% for WTBN. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PIFI charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for WTBN.
Performance
PIFI vs. WTBN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIFI achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than WTBN's 0.02% return.
PIFI
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 1.07%
- 10Y*
- —
WTBN
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIFI vs. WTBN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PIFI ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF | 0.10% | 6.29% | 2.52% | 0.22% |
WTBN WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund | 0.02% | 6.90% | 2.26% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIFI and WTBN is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PIFI and WTBN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIFI vs. WTBN — Risk / Return Rank
PIFI
WTBN
PIFI vs. WTBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF (PIFI) and WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund (WTBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIFI | WTBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.35 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 4.22 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIFI | WTBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.07 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.83 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
PIFI vs. WTBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIFI drawdown since its inception was -10.59%, which is greater than WTBN's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIFI and WTBN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIFI | WTBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.59% | -4.08% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -2.86% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -1.47% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -1.14% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 0.92% | -0.25% |
Volatility
PIFI vs. WTBN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF (PIFI) is 0.84%, while WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund (WTBN) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that PIFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIFI | WTBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 1.32% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.84% | 2.63% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62% | 3.66% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 4.53% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 4.53% | -1.05% |
PIFI vs. WTBN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIFI has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than WTBN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIFI vs. WTBN - Dividend Comparison
PIFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than WTBN's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIFI ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF | 3.75% | 3.16% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 1.22% | 0.25% |
WTBN WisdomTree Bianco Total Return Fund | 3.97% | 4.13% | 3.47% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, PIFI and WTBN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
WTBN has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to PIFI (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIFI dropped -10.59% vs WTBN's -4.08%.
On 1-year performance, WTBN leads with 3.86% vs 3.35% for PIFI. On fees, PIFI is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PIFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WTBN has performed better with a 3.86% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PIFI is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for WTBN.
WTBN has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 3.75% for PIFI.
They also come from different issuers: ClearShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PIFI and 0.59% for WTBN.
PIFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIFI and WTBN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer