PICK vs. DXMO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO).
PICK and DXMO.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PICK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. DXMO.TO is an actively managed fund by Dynamic. It was launched on Jul 2, 2024.
Performance
PICK vs. DXMO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PICK vs. DXMO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 10.23% | 51.89% | -15.60% |
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF | 2.19% | 97.46% | -14.09% |
Different Trading Currencies
PICK is traded in USD, while DXMO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the DXMO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PICK achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly higher than DXMO.TO's 2.19% return.
PICK
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -12.05%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 6M
- 29.18%
- 1Y
- 63.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
DXMO.TO
- 1D
- 6.84%
- 1M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 17.06%
- 1Y
- 76.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PICK vs. DXMO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PICK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DXMO.TO's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PICK vs. DXMO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PICK
DXMO.TO
PICK vs. DXMO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PICK | DXMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.18 | 2.01 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 2.38 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 2.85 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.51 | 10.57 | +1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PICK | DXMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.01 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.05 | -0.88 |
Correlation
The correlation between PICK and DXMO.TO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PICK vs. DXMO.TO - Dividend Comparison
PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than DXMO.TO's 0.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.61% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PICK vs. DXMO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PICK drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, which is greater than DXMO.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICK and DXMO.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PICK | DXMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.87% | -26.12% | -42.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | -26.12% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.15% | -16.37% | +4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.37% | -5.19% | -19.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 7.03% | -2.16% |
Volatility
PICK vs. DXMO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) is 13.01%, while Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) has a volatility of 16.86%. This indicates that PICK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXMO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PICK | DXMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.01% | 16.86% | -3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.97% | 31.46% | -9.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.27% | 38.33% | -9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.51% | 35.69% | -8.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.47% | 35.69% | -7.22% |