PICB vs. ACLO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PICB (Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PICB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the S&P International Corporate Bond Index, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. PICB is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. Over the past year, PICB returned 2.99% vs 5.31% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. PICB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.

Performance

PICB vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF (PICB) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PICB achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 2.21% return.

PICB

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: -0.61%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 2.99%
• 3Y*: 6.15%
• 5Y*: -2.27%
• 10Y*: 0.71%

ACLO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 2.21%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 5.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PICB vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PICB Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF	-0.61%	14.33%	-2.09%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.21%	5.32%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PICB and ACLO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024	-0.26

Return for Risk

PICB vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PICB

PICB Risk / Return Rank: 14
PICB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
PICB Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PICB Omega Ratio Rank: 13
PICB Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
PICB Martin Ratio Rank: 15

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PICB vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF (PICB) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PICB	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	7.29	-6.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	14.85	-14.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	3.41	-2.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	19.90	-19.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.30	164.37	-163.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PICB vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PICB Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PICB and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PICB	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	7.29	-6.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	5.10	-4.90

Drawdowns

PICB vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PICB drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICB and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PICB	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.10%	-1.01%	-36.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.41%	-0.27%	-6.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.81%	0.00%	-11.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.67%	-0.05%	-9.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	0.03%	+2.27%

Volatility

PICB vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF (PICB) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that PICB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PICB	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	0.14%	+2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.00%	0.57%	+5.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.81%	0.73%	+7.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.19%	1.08%	+9.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.06%	1.08%	+8.98%

PICB vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PICB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PICB vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

PICB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than ACLO's 4.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.91%	4.87%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PICB Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF	3.34%	3.17%	3.19%	2.24%	1.64%	1.34%	1.22%	1.42%	1.70%	1.47%	2.20%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PICB and ACLO in my portfolio?

PICB and ACLO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PICB or ACLO?

PICB has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PICB dropped -37.10% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

Which ETF is better, PICB or ACLO?

On 1-year performance, ACLO leads with 5.31% vs 2.99% for PICB. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PICB or ACLO?

Over the 1-year period, ACLO has performed better with a 5.31% return vs 2.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PICB or ACLO?

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PICB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PICB or ACLO?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 3.34% for PICB.

What is the main difference between PICB and ACLO?

PICB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PICB and 0.20% for ACLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.