PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYZX vs. PDBZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYZX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z (PHYZX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYZX achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYZX has outperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 6.03%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.88% annualized return.


PHYZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.80%
6M
2.29%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
6.03%

PDBZX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYZX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHYZX
PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z
1.80%9.04%8.37%12.23%-12.31%5.83%7.73%16.14%-1.25%7.79%
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
0.72%7.70%2.87%7.70%-14.33%-1.46%8.01%14.76%-0.72%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYZX and PDBZX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 1996

0.34

Over the past year, PHYZX and PDBZX have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYZX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYZX
PHYZX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PHYZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBZX
PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYZX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z (PHYZX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYZXPDBZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.27

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.09

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

6.21

+7.85

PHYZX vs. PDBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the PDBZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYZX and PDBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYZXPDBZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.44

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.15

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

0.54

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

1.09

+0.11

Drawdowns

PHYZX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYZX drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYZX and PDBZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYZXPDBZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-20.88%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-3.00%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.76%

-5.51%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.09%

-20.81%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.09%

-20.88%

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-1.29%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-2.31%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

1.01%

-0.45%

Volatility

PHYZX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z (PHYZX) is 1.23%, while PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) has a volatility of 2.08%. This indicates that PHYZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYZXPDBZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

2.08%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

3.30%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56%

4.35%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.09%

6.05%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.54%

5.37%

+0.17%

PHYZX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYZX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYZX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison

PHYZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, more than PDBZX's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
4.57%4.54%4.79%4.60%5.73%2.73%2.94%10.36%4.01%2.87%3.92%3.33%
PHYZX
PGIM High Yield Fund Class Z
6.98%6.95%7.37%7.00%6.15%6.08%8.35%6.21%6.55%6.25%6.36%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYZX and PDBZX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBZX has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to PHYZX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYZX dropped -28.57% vs PDBZX's -20.88%.

PHYZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYZX and PDBZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer