PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYQX vs. CWFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYQX vs. CWFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) and Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYQX achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than CWFIX's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYQX has outperformed CWFIX with an annualized return of 5.87%, while CWFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.01% annualized return.


PHYQX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.85%
6M
2.35%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
5.87%

CWFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.04%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
4.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYQX vs. CWFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHYQX
PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6
1.85%9.18%8.55%12.34%-12.22%5.99%5.79%16.29%-1.18%7.74%
CWFIX
Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund
1.50%6.99%5.78%7.80%-3.17%2.40%4.38%7.33%0.36%3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYQX and CWFIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2014

0.68

The correlation between PHYQX and CWFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYQX vs. CWFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYQX
PHYQX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PHYQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYQX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CWFIX
CWFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CWFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CWFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYQX vs. CWFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) and Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYQXCWFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

2.08

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

5.07

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.54

27.36

-12.83

PHYQX vs. CWFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is lower than the CWFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYQX and CWFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYQXCWFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

3.84

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

1.42

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

1.30

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

1.12

+0.02

Drawdowns

PHYQX vs. CWFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYQX drawdown since its inception was -21.12%, which is greater than CWFIX's maximum drawdown of -12.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYQX and CWFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYQXCWFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.12%

-12.41%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-1.13%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.76%

-1.37%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.05%

-6.36%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.12%

-12.41%

-8.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-0.86%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.21%

+0.34%

Volatility

PHYQX vs. CWFIX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX) at 0.43%. This indicates that PHYQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYQXCWFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

0.43%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

1.19%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

1.49%

+2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.10%

2.76%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.49%

3.09%

+2.40%

PHYQX vs. CWFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYQX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CWFIX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYQX vs. CWFIX - Dividend Comparison

PHYQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than CWFIX's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWFIX
Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund
5.15%5.17%5.09%4.41%3.17%2.79%3.38%3.60%3.24%2.82%3.79%3.32%
PHYQX
PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6
7.09%7.07%7.53%7.09%6.29%6.23%6.56%6.32%6.64%6.38%4.88%7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYQX and CWFIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYQX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to CWFIX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYQX dropped -21.12% vs CWFIX's -12.41%.

CWFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYQX and CWFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer