PHYQX vs. CLFFX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) and Clifford Capital Partners Fund (CLFFX).
PHYQX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Oct 31, 2011. CLFFX is managed by Clifford Capital. It was launched on Jan 30, 2014.
Performance
PHYQX vs. CLFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PHYQX vs. CLFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYQX PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 | -0.77% | 9.18% | 8.55% | 12.34% | -12.22% | 5.99% | 5.79% | 16.29% | -1.18% | 7.74% |
CLFFX Clifford Capital Partners Fund | 1.06% | 18.10% | 9.08% | 4.68% | -4.08% | 19.72% | 10.51% | 23.74% | -9.25% | 10.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHYQX achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than CLFFX's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYQX has underperformed CLFFX with an annualized return of 5.88%, while CLFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.
PHYQX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.88%
CLFFX
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -7.15%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 3.91%
- 1Y
- 18.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.09%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHYQX vs. CLFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHYQX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CLFFX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PHYQX vs. CLFFX — Risk / Return Rank
PHYQX
CLFFX
PHYQX vs. CLFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) and Clifford Capital Partners Fund (CLFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHYQX | CLFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 1.05 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | 1.49 | +1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.22 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 1.32 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 5.35 | +4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHYQX | CLFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.05 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.34 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | 0.54 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.52 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between PHYQX and CLFFX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PHYQX vs. CLFFX - Dividend Comparison
PHYQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than CLFFX's 1.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYQX PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 | 6.58% | 7.07% | 7.53% | 7.09% | 6.29% | 6.23% | 6.56% | 6.32% | 6.64% | 6.38% | 4.88% | 7.05% |
CLFFX Clifford Capital Partners Fund | 1.27% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 4.93% | 1.99% | 4.30% | 2.08% | 1.59% | 5.70% | 5.09% | 0.41% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PHYQX vs. CLFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYQX drawdown since its inception was -21.12%, smaller than the maximum CLFFX drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYQX and CLFFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHYQX | CLFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.12% | -40.20% | +19.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -12.76% | +9.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.05% | -21.36% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.12% | -40.20% | +19.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -7.57% | +5.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -6.06% | +3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 3.33% | -2.61% |
Volatility
PHYQX vs. CLFFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) is 1.41%, while Clifford Capital Partners Fund (CLFFX) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that PHYQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PHYQX | CLFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 4.72% | -3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | 10.59% | -8.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78% | 18.60% | -14.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.05% | 16.85% | -11.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.47% | 19.46% | -13.99% |