PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYPX vs. SCFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYPX vs. SCFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE High Yield Investments (PHYPX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYPX achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than SCFIX's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYPX has outperformed SCFIX with an annualized return of 5.33%, while SCFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.39% annualized return.


PHYPX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.62%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.44%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
8.67%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
5.33%

SCFIX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.42%
6M
2.02%
1Y
5.44%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
4.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYPX vs. SCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHYPX
PACE High Yield Investments
1.82%7.86%8.08%12.77%-11.38%3.64%7.22%12.38%-2.88%7.62%
SCFIX
Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund
1.42%7.02%6.11%9.24%-2.52%5.08%3.36%7.61%0.85%3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYPX and SCFIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.75

The correlation between PHYPX and SCFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYPX vs. SCFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYPX
PHYPX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PHYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SCFIX
SCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYPX vs. SCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE High Yield Investments (PHYPX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYPXSCFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.83

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

4.90

-2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

26.53

-21.12

PHYPX vs. SCFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the SCFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYPX and SCFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYPXSCFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

3.36

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.62

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

1.34

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

1.34

-0.22

Drawdowns

PHYPX vs. SCFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYPX drawdown since its inception was -27.27%, which is greater than SCFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYPX and SCFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYPXSCFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-13.08%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.40%

-1.11%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.32%

-1.72%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.16%

-6.30%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.69%

-13.08%

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-0.51%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.21%

+1.26%

Volatility

PHYPX vs. SCFIX - Volatility Comparison

PACE High Yield Investments (PHYPX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) at 0.50%. This indicates that PHYPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYPXSCFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.50%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

1.30%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.01%

1.63%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.69%

2.77%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

3.28%

+1.84%

PHYPX vs. SCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYPX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFIX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYPX vs. SCFIX - Dividend Comparison

PHYPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than SCFIX's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHYPX
PACE High Yield Investments
6.26%6.18%6.34%6.15%5.77%5.97%5.33%5.72%6.15%5.54%5.75%6.02%
SCFIX
Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund
5.32%5.54%5.85%5.21%3.86%4.93%3.24%3.78%3.87%3.09%3.07%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYPX and SCFIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYPX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to SCFIX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYPX dropped -27.27% vs SCFIX's -13.08%.

SCFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYPX and SCFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer