PHYPX vs. PCMNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PHYPX (PACE High Yield Investments) and PCMNX (PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments) are both mutual funds - PHYPX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by UBS, while PCMNX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by UBS. Over the past 10 years, PHYPX returned 5.33%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for PCMNX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PHYPX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for PCMNX.

Performance

PHYPX vs. PCMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE High Yield Investments (PHYPX) and PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYPX achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than PCMNX's 1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYPX has outperformed PCMNX with an annualized return of 5.33%, while PCMNX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.

PHYPX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 2.44%
• 1Y: 7.53%
• 3Y*: 8.67%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 5.33%

PCMNX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 6.59%
• 3Y*: 3.49%
• 5Y*: 0.89%
• 10Y*: 1.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYPX vs. PCMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PHYPX PACE High Yield Investments	1.82%	7.86%	8.08%	12.77%	-11.38%	3.64%	7.22%	12.38%	-2.88%	7.62%
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments	1.20%	4.52%	0.85%	5.54%	-7.30%	0.70%	4.63%	7.32%	0.85%	4.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYPX and PCMNX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2006	0.08

Over the past year, PHYPX and PCMNX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PHYPX vs. PCMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYPX

PHYPX Risk / Return Rank: 43
PHYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PHYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PHYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PHYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PHYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

PCMNX

PCMNX Risk / Return Rank: 74
PCMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PCMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
PCMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PCMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PCMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYPX vs. PCMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE High Yield Investments (PHYPX) and PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHYPX	PCMNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	3.17	-1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	4.84	-2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.89	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	2.65	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.41	8.22	-2.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHYPX vs. PCMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the PCMNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYPX and PCMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHYPX	PCMNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	3.17	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.29	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.05	0.57	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	1.26	-0.15

Drawdowns

PHYPX vs. PCMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYPX drawdown since its inception was -27.27%, which is greater than PCMNX's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYPX and PCMNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHYPX	PCMNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.27%	-11.62%	-15.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.40%	-2.69%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.32%	-4.41%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.16%	-11.62%	-5.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.69%	-11.62%	-11.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.94%	+0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.91%	-1.39%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.47%	0.84%	+0.63%

Volatility

PHYPX vs. PCMNX - Volatility Comparison

PACE High Yield Investments (PHYPX) and PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) have volatilities of 0.81% and 0.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHYPX	PCMNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.81%	0.80%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.11%	1.67%	+0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.01%	2.26%	+2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.69%	3.07%	+1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.12%	3.35%	+1.77%

PHYPX vs. PCMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYPX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than PCMNX's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHYPX vs. PCMNX - Dividend Comparison

PHYPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than PCMNX's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments	2.82%	2.49%	2.58%	2.37%	2.30%	2.38%	2.47%	3.41%	3.11%	2.89%	3.33%	3.23%
PHYPX PACE High Yield Investments	6.26%	6.18%	6.34%	6.15%	5.77%	5.97%	5.33%	5.72%	6.15%	5.54%	5.75%	6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHYPX and PCMNX in my portfolio?

PHYPX and PCMNX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PHYPX or PCMNX?

PHYPX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to PCMNX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYPX dropped -27.27% vs PCMNX's -11.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.