PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHTTX vs. FFSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHTTX vs. FFSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2020 Fund (PHTTX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHTTX achieves a 5.07% return, which is significantly lower than FFSFX's 14.96% return.


PHTTX

1D
0.62%
1M
1.08%
YTD
5.07%
6M
5.08%
1Y
13.81%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
7.08%

FFSFX

1D
1.50%
1M
3.36%
YTD
14.96%
6M
15.00%
1Y
32.51%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTTX vs. FFSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PHTTX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2020 Fund
5.07%12.10%8.85%12.06%-14.36%9.94%12.63%5.77%
FFSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund
14.96%23.76%14.01%20.54%-18.28%16.54%18.08%9.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTTX and FFSFX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.93

The correlation between PHTTX and FFSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHTTX vs. FFSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTTX
PHTTX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PHTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSFX
FFSFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTTX vs. FFSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2020 Fund (PHTTX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHTTXFFSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.29

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.16

14.37

-1.22

PHTTX vs. FFSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the FFSFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTTX and FFSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHTTX vs. FFSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTTX drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum FFSFX drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTTX and FFSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHTTXFFSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.94%

-31.03%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.62%

-9.79%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.20%

-15.43%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.90%

-27.31%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-5.87%

+2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

2.23%

-1.19%

Volatility

PHTTX vs. FFSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2020 Fund (PHTTX) is 2.66%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that PHTTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHTTXFFSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

5.83%

-3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.32%

11.74%

-6.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.38%

13.74%

-7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.09%

15.20%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

17.10%

-8.53%

PHTTX vs. FFSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTTX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSFX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHTTX vs. FFSFX - Dividend Comparison

PHTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than FFSFX's 4.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund
4.86%3.69%2.29%2.01%8.77%7.81%2.25%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHTTX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2020 Fund
5.83%6.12%3.67%3.46%7.03%5.97%4.75%3.12%3.36%2.52%2.13%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PHTTX and FFSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSFX has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to PHTTX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTTX dropped -18.94% vs FFSFX's -31.03%.

FFSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHTTX and FFSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer