PHTJX vs. PTEAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) and Principal Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (PTEAX).
PHTJX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014. PTEAX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Jan 2, 1977.
Performance
PHTJX vs. PTEAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PHTJX vs. PTEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTJX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund | -3.09% | 15.57% | 12.67% | 16.45% | -17.37% | 15.57% | 15.13% | 22.69% | -8.00% | 18.13% |
PTEAX Principal Tax-Exempt Bond Fund | -1.06% | 4.68% | 2.10% | 6.35% | -12.18% | 2.71% | 4.80% | 9.05% | 0.44% | 6.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHTJX achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly lower than PTEAX's -1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PHTJX has outperformed PTEAX with an annualized return of 8.68%, while PTEAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.93% annualized return.
PHTJX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- -3.09%
- 6M
- -0.84%
- 1Y
- 12.31%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
PTEAX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- -1.06%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHTJX vs. PTEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHTJX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PTEAX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PHTJX vs. PTEAX — Risk / Return Rank
PHTJX
PTEAX
PHTJX vs. PTEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) and Principal Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (PTEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHTJX | PTEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 0.84 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.14 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 0.92 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.45 | 2.97 | +3.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHTJX | PTEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.84 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.07 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.44 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.31 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between PHTJX and PTEAX is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PHTJX vs. PTEAX - Dividend Comparison
PHTJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than PTEAX's 3.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTJX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund | 4.83% | 4.68% | 4.09% | 3.37% | 8.44% | 4.96% | 3.98% | 3.71% | 4.01% | 2.31% | 1.99% | 1.67% |
PTEAX Principal Tax-Exempt Bond Fund | 3.89% | 4.66% | 3.73% | 2.81% | 2.27% | 2.15% | 2.23% | 3.09% | 3.68% | 3.69% | 3.91% | 3.75% |
Drawdowns
PHTJX vs. PTEAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHTJX drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum PTEAX drawdown of -38.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTJX and PTEAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHTJX | PTEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -38.72% | +11.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.63% | -4.78% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -17.37% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.17% | -17.37% | -9.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -2.95% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -5.95% | +1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.49% | +0.28% |
Volatility
PHTJX vs. PTEAX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Principal Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (PTEAX) at 1.01%. This indicates that PHTJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PHTJX | PTEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 1.01% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.47% | 1.80% | +4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.39% | 4.92% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 3.96% | +7.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.47% | 4.39% | +8.08% |