PHTJX vs. PPLIX
PHTJX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund) and PPLIX (Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Principal. Over the past 10 years, PHTJX returned 9.57%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for PPLIX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PHTJX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for PPLIX.
Performance
PHTJX vs. PPLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHTJX achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than PPLIX's 8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PHTJX has underperformed PPLIX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while PPLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.
PHTJX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
PPLIX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
PHTJX vs. PPLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTJX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund | 7.41% | 15.57% | 12.67% | 16.45% | -17.37% | 15.57% | 15.13% | 22.69% | -8.00% | 18.13% |
PPLIX Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund | 8.51% | 17.55% | 19.12% | 20.36% | -18.78% | 17.04% | 16.56% | 26.67% | -8.74% | 22.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHTJX and PPLIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014 | 0.99 |
The correlation between PHTJX and PPLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHTJX vs. PPLIX — Risk / Return Rank
PHTJX
PPLIX
PHTJX vs. PPLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) and Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHTJX | PPLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.34 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.51 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.87 | 11.27 | +2.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHTJX | PPLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 1.85 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.60 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.74 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.45 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
PHTJX vs. PPLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHTJX drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum PPLIX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTJX and PPLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHTJX | PPLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -55.61% | +28.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -8.57% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.58% | -15.59% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -26.85% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.17% | -32.67% | +5.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.86% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -8.30% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.42% | 1.90% | -0.48% |
Volatility
PHTJX vs. PPLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) is 2.79%, while Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that PHTJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHTJX | PPLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 3.39% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 9.25% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.69% | 11.60% | -2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 15.47% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 15.59% | -3.08% |
PHTJX vs. PPLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHTJX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PPLIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PHTJX vs. PPLIX - Dividend Comparison
PHTJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than PPLIX's 9.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTJX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund | 4.36% | 4.68% | 4.09% | 3.37% | 8.44% | 4.96% | 3.98% | 3.71% | 4.01% | 2.31% | 1.99% | 1.67% |
PPLIX Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund | 9.17% | 9.95% | 11.56% | 4.41% | 9.40% | 8.04% | 5.23% | 7.16% | 8.64% | 5.12% | 4.82% | 6.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, PHTJX and PPLIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PPLIX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to PHTJX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTJX dropped -27.17% vs PPLIX's -55.61%.
PHTJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHTJX and PPLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer