PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHSP.L vs. BRNT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHSP.L vs. BRNT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil (BRNT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PHSP.L is traded in GBp, while BRNT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRNT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHSP.L achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than BRNT.L's 80.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSP.L has outperformed BRNT.L with an annualized return of 16.46%, while BRNT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.44% annualized return.


PHSP.L

1D
0.46%
1M
1.03%
YTD
2.97%
6M
28.18%
1Y
115.25%
3Y*
41.79%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
16.46%

BRNT.L

1D
-2.63%
1M
-8.78%
YTD
80.86%
6M
74.99%
1Y
86.41%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
24.84%
10Y*
14.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHSP.L vs. BRNT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Silver
2.97%129.68%22.85%-6.51%15.50%-12.11%40.85%12.57%-3.55%-5.67%
BRNT.L
WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil
80.86%-13.01%9.33%-3.98%51.16%67.83%-35.18%27.12%-8.81%2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PHSP.L and BRNT.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2012

0.11

The correlation between PHSP.L and BRNT.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHSP.L vs. BRNT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHSP.L
PHSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BRNT.L
BRNT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BRNT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRNT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRNT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BRNT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRNT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHSP.L vs. BRNT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil (BRNT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHSP.LBRNT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

4.67

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

8.70

-2.23

PHSP.L vs. BRNT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the BRNT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHSP.L and BRNT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHSP.LBRNT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.96

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.71

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.41

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.08

+0.29

Drawdowns

PHSP.L vs. BRNT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHSP.L drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, smaller than the maximum BRNT.L drawdown of -82.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSP.L and BRNT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHSP.LBRNT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.01%

-82.19%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.75%

-18.40%

-20.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.75%

-27.96%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.75%

-34.39%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.75%

-70.61%

+31.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.72%

-8.90%

-24.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.07%

-41.49%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.73%

9.90%

+7.83%

Volatility

PHSP.L vs. BRNT.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil (BRNT.L) have volatilities of 16.28% and 15.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHSP.LBRNT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.28%

15.69%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.17%

38.01%

+13.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.02%

43.83%

+10.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.98%

35.10%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.24%

35.53%

-6.29%

PHSP.L vs. BRNT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PHSP.L and BRNT.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

PHSP.L vs. BRNT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PHSP.L nor BRNT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PHSP.L and BRNT.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PHSP.L and BRNT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

PHSP.L is categorized as Silver, while BRNT.L is Oil & Gas. PHSP.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while BRNT.L tracks Bloomberg Brent Crude Subindex.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHSP.L and BRNT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer