PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHSP.L vs. 4COP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHSP.L vs. 4COP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PHSP.L is traded in GBp, while 4COP.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 4COP.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHSP.L achieves a -22.02% return, which is significantly lower than 4COP.DE's 1.02% return.


PHSP.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
-16.75%
6M
-37.43%
YTD
-22.02%
1Y
45.55%
3Y*
28.72%
5Y*
16.80%
10Y*
10.07%

4COP.DE

1D
-2.95%
1M
-15.85%
6M
-9.31%
YTD
1.02%
1Y
70.67%
3Y*
24.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHSP.L vs. 4COP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PHSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Silver
-22.02%129.68%22.85%-6.51%15.50%-1.70%
4COP.DE
Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
1.02%82.68%4.59%2.84%12.60%1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PHSP.L and 4COP.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2021

0.51

Over the past year, PHSP.L and 4COP.DE have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHSP.L vs. 4COP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHSP.L
PHSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

4COP.DE
4COP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
4COP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHSP.L vs. 4COP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHSP.L4COP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.69

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.96

7.01

-5.05

PHSP.L vs. 4COP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the 4COP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHSP.L and 4COP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHSP.L vs. 4COP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHSP.L drawdown since its inception was -70.04%, which is greater than 4COP.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSP.L and 4COP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHSP.L4COP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.04%

-39.19%

-30.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.80%

-26.54%

-23.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.80%

-39.19%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.80%

-23.18%

-26.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.03%

-13.67%

-30.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.43%

10.16%

+13.27%

Volatility

PHSP.L vs. 4COP.DE - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE) have volatilities of 12.52% and 12.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHSP.L4COP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.52%

12.82%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.48%

35.44%

+15.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.31%

41.52%

+14.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.72%

32.94%

+3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.04%

32.94%

-1.90%

PHSP.L vs. 4COP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHSP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than 4COP.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHSP.L vs. 4COP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither PHSP.L nor 4COP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PHSP.L and 4COP.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PHSP.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PHSP.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for 4COP.DE.

PHSP.L is categorized as Silver, while 4COP.DE is Copper. PHSP.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while 4COP.DE tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PHSP.L and 0.55% for 4COP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHSP.L and 4COP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer