PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHE.TO vs. PAYF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHE.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund (PHE.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHE.TO achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than PAYF.TO's 3.05% return.


PHE.TO

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.99%
6M
1.69%
YTD
1.54%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
9.65%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
6.87%
ALL TIME*
5.80%

PAYF.TO

1D
0.27%
1M
1.03%
6M
3.10%
YTD
3.05%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$14.58KCA$14.42KCA$25.69K
CA$420.41CA$976.01CA$1.79K

PHE.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PHE.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund
1.54%12.04%12.63%10.64%-9.81%20.76%2.62%5.09%
PAYF.TO
Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund
3.05%9.96%11.58%13.46%-3.26%8.85%2.97%5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PHE.TO and PAYF.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019

0.28

The correlation between PHE.TO and PAYF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHE.TO vs. PAYF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHE.TO
PHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

PAYF.TO
PAYF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PAYF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHE.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund (PHE.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHE.TOPAYF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

0.87

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.50

3.13

+1.37

PHE.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the PAYF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHE.TO and PAYF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHE.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, which is greater than PAYF.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHE.TO and PAYF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHE.TOPAYF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-17.09%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-5.73%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.34%

-11.66%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.48%

-11.66%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.91%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-1.85%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.59%

+0.03%

Volatility

PHE.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund (PHE.TO) is 1.77%, while Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund (PAYF.TO) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that PHE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAYF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHE.TOPAYF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

2.31%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.81%

6.35%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.47%

7.02%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.63%

9.66%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.14%

9.51%

+0.63%

PHE.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHE.TO has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than PAYF.TO's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHE.TO vs. PAYF.TO - Dividend Comparison

PHE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAYF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PAYF.TO
Purpose Enhanced Premium Yield Fund
8.88%8.75%8.82%8.91%8.02%7.17%7.27%4.05%
PHE.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund
0.00%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHE.TO and PAYF.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAYF.TO is cheaper at 0.94% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAYF.TO is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for PHE.TO.

PHE.TO is categorized as Equity Hedged, while PAYF.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for PHE.TO and 0.94% for PAYF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHE.TO and PAYF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer