PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHDG vs. HEGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHDG vs. HEGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHDG achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than HEGD's 7.10% return.


PHDG

1D
1.44%
1M
5.27%
YTD
15.43%
6M
13.92%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
7.32%

HEGD

1D
0.24%
1M
3.09%
YTD
7.10%
6M
6.51%
1Y
18.32%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHDG vs. HEGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
15.43%2.72%10.95%8.18%-14.09%15.67%1.60%
HEGD
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
7.10%12.95%15.24%14.16%-11.25%17.30%0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PHDG and HEGD is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.65

The correlation between PHDG and HEGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

PHDG vs. HEGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PHDG
HEGD

Technology

35.1%
36.1%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.8%

Communication Services

11.0%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.4%

Industrials

8.3%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.9%

Energy

3.6%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

PHDG
35.1%
HEGD
36.1%

Financial Services

PHDG
11.9%
HEGD
11.8%

Communication Services

PHDG
11.0%
HEGD
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PHDG
10.1%
HEGD
10.1%

Healthcare

PHDG
8.7%
HEGD
8.4%

Industrials

PHDG
8.3%
HEGD
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

PHDG
5.0%
HEGD
4.9%

Energy

PHDG
3.6%
HEGD
3.5%

Utilities

PHDG
2.4%
HEGD
2.3%

Real Estate

PHDG
1.9%
HEGD
1.9%

Basic Materials

PHDG
1.8%
HEGD
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHDG vs. HEGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHDG
PHDG Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

HEGD
HEGD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HEGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEGD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HEGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEGD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHDG vs. HEGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHDGHEGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.49

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.65

4.20

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.46

16.65

+11.81

PHDG vs. HEGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHDG Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the HEGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHDG and HEGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHDGHEGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

2.65

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.97

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.07

-0.52

Drawdowns

PHDG vs. HEGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHDG drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, which is greater than HEGD's maximum drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHDG and HEGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHDGHEGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.70%

-14.56%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-4.39%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.78%

-8.14%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.06%

-14.56%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.39%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-3.66%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.10%

-0.15%

Volatility

PHDG vs. HEGD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) at 2.29%. This indicates that PHDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHDGHEGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

2.29%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

4.95%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

6.94%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.94%

9.40%

+1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.93%

9.35%

+2.58%

PHDG vs. HEGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHDG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HEGD's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHDG vs. HEGD - Dividend Comparison

PHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than HEGD's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEGD
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
0.33%0.36%0.43%0.39%0.87%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
1.84%2.10%1.94%1.93%1.35%0.44%0.63%1.80%1.56%1.83%2.29%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHDG and HEGD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHDG has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to HEGD (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHDG dropped -17.70% vs HEGD's -14.56%.

On 5-year performance, HEGD leads with 9.09% vs 5.75% for PHDG. On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, HEGD has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HEGD has performed better with a 9.09% return vs 5.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for HEGD.

PHDG has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.33% for HEGD.

PHDG tracks S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index, while HEGD tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Swan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHDG and 0.88% for HEGD.

PHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHDG and HEGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer